The Political Economy of Human Security: Evaluating Fiscal Trade-Offs, Constitutional Governance, and Food Safety in Indonesia’s Free Nutritious Meal Program (MBG)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38142/jtep.v6i3.2087Keywords:
Free Nutritious Meal Program (MBG), Fiscal Sustainability, Food Safety, Constitutional Law, IndonesiaAbstract
Indonesia’s Free Nutritious Meal Program (Makan Bergizi Gratis / MBG), administered by the newly established Badan Gizi Nasional (National Nutrition Agency), represents an unprecedented expansion of the Indonesian welfare state. Designed as a strategic intervention to eradicate structural malnutrition, reduce stunting, and capture the nation's demographic dividend ahead of the "Golden Indonesia 2045" vision, the program aims to feed over 63 million beneficiaries. However, this paper argues that the MBG program introduces severe systemic vulnerabilities when analyzed through the dual lenses of Non-Traditional Security (NTS) and neoclassical political economy. By critically examining the massive fiscal burden of the program—costing tens of trillions of Rupiah—this study highlights the macroeconomic risks and the intense political contestation over the constitutionally mandated 20% education budget. This fiscal friction culminated in the landmark July 2026 Constitutional Court (MK) ruling, which strictly ring-fenced educational funds from being cannibalized by the MBG. Furthermore, the paper investigates the micro-governance challenges of operating a highly decentralized procurement network, emphasizing the dual threats of localized rent-seeking and acute public health crises caused by inadequate food safety standards, as evidenced by recent National Agency of Drug and Food Control (BPOM) data. The article concludes that without strict fiscal discipline, dynamic poverty targeting, and the rigorous enforcement of sanitation regulations, the MBG risks undermining the very human and economic security it seeks to protect.
References
Abdurrahman, S. (2025, May 15). BPOM Catat 17 Kejadian Luar Biasa Kasus Keracunan MBG Sejak Januari. https://www.tempo.co/politik/bpom-catat-17-kejadian-luar-biasa-kasus-keracunan-mbg-sejak-januari-1444155
Aslam, M., & Rawal, S. (2019). Political Economy of the Education Workforce (Background Paper for Transforming the Education Workforce: Learning Teams for a Learning Generation). Education Commission. https://educationcommission.org/
Azzahra’, L., & Damayanti, N. A. (2026). Empowering Mothers through the Utilization of Maternal and Child Health Handbooks in Preventing Child Growth and Development Problems. In H. Saptaningtyas, A. Hidayat, S. Hanggana, S. Khoiriyah, A. Arif, & C. P. Sari (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Multidisciplinary Studies 2025 (ICOMSI 2025) (Vol. 1012, pp. 380–392). Atlantis Press SARL. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-571-3_32
Badan Kebijakan Pembangunan Kesehatan. (2025, May 27). SSGI 2024: National Stunting Prevalence Drops to 19.8%. Badan Kebijakan Pembangunan Kesehatan, Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. https://www.badankebijakan.kemkes.go.id/en/ssgi-2024-prevalensi-stunting-nasional-turun-menjadi-198/
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Collier, D. (2011). Understanding process tracing. PS: Political Science & Politics, 44(4), 823–830.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://books.google.com/books/about/Qualitative_Inquiry_and_Research_Design.html?id=gX1ZDwAAQBAJ
Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80–88.
Firdaus, M. J. B. (2026). Change and Continuity in Indonesia’s Foreign Policy: Food Security Strategic Agenda from President Jokowi to Prabowo Administration. Insignia: Journal of International Relations, 12(2), 165. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.ins.2025.12.2.19400
Huberman, A. (2014). Qualitative data analysis a methods sourcebook.
Indonesia Baik. (2024). 4 Main Targets of the Free Nutritious Meal Program. Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia. https://indonesiabaik.id/infografis/4-target-utama-program-makan-bergizi-gratis
Ito, H., & Kawai, M. (2024). Monetary and fiscal policy impacts under alternative trilemma regimes. Journal of International Money and Finance, 149, 103182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2024.103182
Karyono, A., Nugroho, F., & Laksmono, B. S. (2026). Indonesia’s Program Keluarga Harapan (2007–2024): Social investment aspirations, political instrumentalisation, and contested developmental outcomes. Cogent Social Sciences, 12(1), 2663682. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2026.2663682
Mas’udi, W., & Hanif, H. (2011). Welfare politics in contemporary Indonesia; Examining welfare vision of law 11/2009. PCD Journal, 95–124.
Megananda, T. B., & Farras, J. I. (2026). Free Nutritious Meals Program Budget and Investor Trust: A Comparative International Study. International Journal of Management and Business Economics, 4(3), 765–774. https://doi.org/10.58540/ijmebe.v4i3.2344
Muhid, H. K., Yanuar, Y., & Antara. (2024, August 22). Jokowi Bikin Badan Gizi Nasional, Kelola Anggaran Rp 71 Triliun, Buat Apa? https://www.tempo.co/politik/jokowi-bikin-badan-gizi-nasional-kelola-anggaran-rp-71-triliun-buat-apa--17045
Pakpahan, M. (2010). Welfare State, The 1945 Constitution, and Industrial Relations. Journal of Administration Science & Organization, 17 (3), 209–217.
Prawira, A. E. (2025, May 22). BPOM Ungkap 3 Penyebab Utama Keracunan Makanan Program Makan Bergizi Gratis. Liputan6.com. https://www.liputan6.com/health/read/6030641/bpom-ungkap-3-penyebab-utama-keracunan-makanan-program-makan-bergizi-gratis
Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2026, January 30). Peraturan Presiden Nomor 83 Tahun 2024 tentang Badan Gizi Nasional (Landasan Program Makan Bergizi Gratis). Sekretariat Wakil Presiden Republik Indonesia. https://stunting.go.id/peraturan-presiden-nomor-83-tahun-2024-tentang-badan-gizi-nasional-landasan-program-makan-bergizi-gratis/
Rahmah, H. A., Anggraini, A., Nilasari, Y. P., & Salsabilla, E. P. (2025). Analisis efektivitas program makan bergizi gratis di sekolah dasar Indonesia tahun 2025. Integrative Perspectives of Social and Science Journal, 2(2 Mei), 2855–2866.
Rizkyta, A., & Al Jannah, N. Z. (2024). Book Review: “Hara, A.E., Indriastuti, S., & Trihartono, A. (2023). Keamanan Insani (Human Security): Eksplorasi berbagai Perspektif di Dunia. Pandiva. 238 pp.” Journal of Urban Sociology, 1(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.30742/jus.v1i1.3549
Virlana, B., & Tjoneng, A. (2025). Kepastian Hukum Program Makan Bergizi Gratis: Kajian atas Usulan Pemanfaatan Dana Zakat. MORALITY: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 11(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.52947/morality.v11i1.975
Wu, C. (2025). Redefining concepts of nation and national security and establishing their models for the new era. Journal of Safety and Sustainability, 2(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsasus.2024.12.002
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications (Vol. 6). Sage Thousand Oaks, CA.
Yuda, T. K. (2018). Welfare Regime Transformation in Indonesia: A Citizenship Debate. Masyarakat Jurnal Sosiologi, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.7454/MJS.v23i2.8278
Yusriadi, Y., Cahaya, A., & Hamzah, F. (2026). Motivations and challenges in adopting food security strategies: Insights from rural Indonesia. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 13, 102497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102497
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mansur Juned

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.









