The Multiplier Mirage: The Political Economy Of Public Procurement And Fiscal Centralization in Indonesia’s 2026 State Budget
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38142/jtep.v6i3.2088Keywords:
Indonesia, APBN 2026, Public Procurement, , Fiscal Multiplier, DecentralizationAbstract
The 2026 Indonesian State Budget (APBN) represents a profound paradigm shift in the nation’s fiscal strategy, departing from two decades of progressive decentralization in favor of a highly centralized, front-loaded expenditure model. This pivot is primarily operationalized through two massive socioeconomic initiatives: the Free Nutritious Meal (Makan Bergizi Gratis – MBG) program and the consolidation of subsidized goods distribution via the Red and White Village Cooperatives (Koperasi Desa Merah Putih – KDMP). Grounded in the theoretical promise of leveraging the demographic dividend to maximize government spending multipliers, these programs aim to stimulate regional economies and mitigate deflationary pressures inherited from early 2025. However, early implementation reveals a macroeconomic paradox: unprecedented state expenditure coexisting with stagnant domestic aggregate demand and regional liquidity starvation. This paper utilizes a political economy framework to analyze this discrepancy, conceptualized here as the "multiplier mirage." By examining the mechanisms of public procurement, this study identifies severe institutional bottlenecks characterized by both active waste (rent-seeking and opaque vendor appointments) and passive waste (administrative centralization and supply chain monopolization). Anchored in foundational literature on fiscal multipliers in developing nations and the mechanics of state clientelism, the analysis concludes that bypassing transparent e-procurement systems and crowding out local agricultural supply chains effectively extracts wealth from the regions rather than stimulating them. The paper argues that without immediate structural reforms—specifically, mandatory open electronic contracting and the enforcement of localized sourcing quotas—the intended fiscal stimulus will continue to be intercepted by systemic inefficiencies, ultimately jeopardizing Indonesia’s macroeconomic stability.
References
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2001). The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation. American Economic Review, 91(5), 1369–1401. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.5.1369
Afridi, F. (2010). Child welfare programs and child nutrition: Evidence from a mandated school meal program in India. Journal of Development Economics, 92(2), 152–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2009.02.002
Aspinall, E., & Berenschot, W. (2019). Democracy for sale: Elections, clientelism, and the state in Indonesia. Cornell University Press.
Badan Gizi Nasional. (2026, July 27). BGN Optimalkan Program MBG untuk Menggerakkan Ekonomi Lokal dan Menjaga Stabilitas Harga Pangan. Badan Gizi Nasional. https://www.bgn.go.id/news/siaran-pers/bgn-optimalkan-program-mbg-untuk-menggerakkan-ekonomi-lokal-dan-menjaga-stabilitas-harga-pangan
Bandiera, O., Prat, A., & Valletti, T. (2009). Active and Passive Waste in Government Spending: Evidence from a Policy Experiment. American Economic Review, 99(4), 1278–1308. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.99.4.1278
Basso, H. S., & Rachedi, O. (2021). The Young, the Old, and the Government: Demographics and Fiscal Multipliers. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 13(4), 110–141. https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.20190174
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
BRIGHTS. (2025). Macro Strategy: The 2026 Proposed Budget: Building Up Momentum. BRI Danareksa Sekuritas. https://www.brights.id/id/riset-dan-berita/laporan-riset/macro-strategy-the-2026-proposed-budget-building-up-momentum
Fisman, R. (2001). Estimating the Value of Political Connections. American Economic Review, 91(4), 1095–1102. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.4.1095
Fitrani, F., Hofman, B., & Kaiser *, K. (2005). Unity in diversity? The creation of new local governments in a decentralising Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 41(1), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074910500072690
Hadiz, V. R. (2004). Decentralization and democracy in Indonesia: A critique of neo‐institutionalist perspectives. Development and Change, 35(4), 697–718.
Hapsari, M. A., & Ismoyo, B. (2024, August 14). Indonesia Proposes $46B Education Budget, Including Free Meals Program. Jakarta Globe. https://jakartaglobe.id/news/indonesia-proposes-46b-education-budget-including-free-meals-program
Henderson, J. V., & Kuncoro, A. (2004). Corruption in Indonesia (No. W10674; p. w10674). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w10674
Ilzetzki, E., Mendoza, E. G., & Végh, C. A. (2013). How big (small?) are fiscal multipliers? Journal of Monetary Economics, 60(2), 239–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2012.10.011
Kenny, C. (2009). Transport construction, corruption and developing countries. Transport Reviews, 29(1), 21–41.
Kraay, A. (2012). How large is the Government Spending Multiplier? Evidence from World Bank Lending. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(2), 829–887. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjs008
Kristiansen, S., & Ramli, M. (2006). Buying an income: The market for civil service positions in Indonesia. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 207–233.
Lewis, B. D. (2017). Local government spending and service delivery in Indonesia: The perverse effects of substantial fiscal resources. Regional Studies, 51(11), 1695–1707.
Lewis-Faupel, S., Neggers, Y., Olken, B. A., & Pande, R. (2016). Can Electronic Procurement Improve Infrastructure Provision? Evidence from Public Works in India and Indonesia. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 8(3), 258–283. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20140258
Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 681–712. https://doi.org/10.2307/2946696
Neupane, A., Soar, J., Vaidya, K., & Yong, J. (2012). Role of public e-procurement technology to reduce corruption in government procurement. Proceedings of the 5th international public procurement conference (IPPC5).
Olken, B. A. (2007). Monitoring corruption: Evidence from a field experiment in Indonesia. Journal of Political Economy, 115(2), 200–249.
Prabowo, H. Y., & Cooper, K. (2016). Re-understanding corruption in the Indonesian public sector through three behavioral lenses. Journal of Financial Crime, 23(4), 1028–1062.
Rehema, Z. Y. (2026, August 18). Dana Desa Diajukan Rp 77 Triliun, Terbesar dalam Sejarah RI. CNBC Indonesia. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/research/20260818123826-128-760275/dana-desa-diajukan-rp-77-triliun-terbesar-dalam-sejarah-ri
Rodrik, D. (2008). Second-Best Institutions. American Economic Review, 98(2), 100–104. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.2.100
Rose-Ackerman, S. (1999). Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175098
Salam, H., & Anugrahanto, N. C. (2025, September 15). Pemangkasan Besar-Besaran Dana Transfer ke Daerah pada APBN 2026 Dipertanyakan. Harian Kompas. https://www.kompas.id/artikel/pemangkasan-besar-besaran-dana-transfer-ke-daerah-pada-apbn-2026-dipertanyakan
Schütte, S. A. (2012). Against the odds: Anti‐corruption reform in Indonesia. Public Administration and Development, 32(1), 38–48.
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1993). Corruption. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 599–617.
Strategics, T. (2026, August 17). Analysis: RI’s 5.29 Percent Growth Tests Sustainability of Fiscal Expansion. The Jakarta Post. https://www.thejakartapost.com/opinion/2026/08/17/analysis-ris-5-29-percent-growth-tests-sustainability-of-fiscal-expansion
The PRAKARSA. (2026, June 2). Critical notes on Indonesia’s fiscal and economic policy 2026: False growth amid weak purchasing power, vulnerable work, and increasing fiscal pressure. The PRAKARSA. https://theprakarsa.org/en/catatan-kritis-atas-kebijakan-fiskal-dan-ekonomi-indonesia-2026-pertumbuhan-semu-di-tengah-daya-beli-lemah-kerja-rentan-dan-fiskal-yang-kian-tertekan/
Trading Economics. (n.d.). Pengeluaran Pemerintah Indonesia. Trading Economics. Retrieved https://id.tradingeconomics.com/indonesia/government-spending
World Bank. (2020). Indonesia Public Expenditure Review 2020: Spending for Better Results. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1553-9
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications (Vol. 6). Sage Thousand Oaks, CA
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Syahrul Salam
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
