The Concept of Strategic Leadership in Strengthening Indonesia's National Defense Resilience in Facing Hybrid Warfare Threats

Edmund Gultom; Asep Adang Supriyadi; Sundring Pantja Djati; Prijanto Prijanto; Sri Sundari

doi:10.38142/ijesss.v7i4.2040

Authors

Edmund Gultom Universitas Pertahanan, Indonesia
Asep Adang Supriyadi Universitas Pertahanan, Indonesia
Sundring Pantja Djati Universitas Esa Unggul, Indonesia
Prijanto Prijanto Universitas Pertahanan, Indonesia
Sri Sundari Universitas Pertahanan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38142/ijesss.v7i4.2040

Keywords:

strategic leadership, hybrid warfare, Indonesian defense resilience

Abstract

Changes in the international security environment marked by the spread of hybrid warfare require Indonesia to have strategic leadership capable of integrating military and non-military dimensions in strengthening national defense resilience. This article aims to examine the role of strategic leadership in strengthening Indonesia's defense resilience in the face of hybrid warfare threats. This study uses a descriptive qualitative approach based on a conceptual review and library study of academic literature, as well as official Indonesian government policy documents. The results of the study map the conceptual ambiguity between hybrid threats and hybrid warfare, the operational dimensions of hybrid threats in the maritime, information, and extremism domains, strategic leadership competencies in managing defense capabilities and complexity, and Indonesia's strategic leadership position in Indo-Pacific regional defense diplomacy, ranging from multilateral exercises to ASEAN strategic partnerships. This study concludes that strengthening Indonesia's defense resilience requires five pillars of strategic leadership: conceptual clarity, capability-based leadership, cooperative diplomacy, ethical-resilient leadership, and institutional learning-based leadership. Based on these findings, this article recommends the development of a doctrinal framework that differentiates hybrid threats and hybrid warfare, reforming defense acquisition strategies towards selective self-reliance, strengthening multilateral defense diplomacy, developing an ethics-based strategic leadership program for Indonesian defense officers and officials, and establishing a permanent coordination forum across ministries and institutions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adamsky, D. (2025). Quo Vadis, Russian Deterrence? Strategic Culture and Coercion Innovations. International Security, 49(3), 50. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00502

Angstrom, J., & Ljungkvist, K. (2024). Unpacking the varying strategic logics of total defence. Journal of Strategic Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2023.2260958

Bakhshi, J., & Efatmaneshnik, M. (2024). The interplay of capability and complexity in military context: definitions, challenges, and implications. Defence Studies, 25(1), 133. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2024.2415715

Beeson, M. (2022). Decentered? ASEAN's Struggle to Accommodate Great Power Competition. Global Studies Quarterly, 2(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksab044

Dewanto, P. A., & Estriani, H. N. (2026). Counter-trafficking Policies and the Overseas Labour Protection Regime in Indonesia: Between Populism and Securitisation. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs. https://doi.org/10.1177/18681034261432677

Dov Bachmann, S. D., Putter, D., & Duczynski, G. (2023). Hybrid warfare and disinformation: A Ukraine war perspective. Global Policy. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13257

Eggen, K.-A. (2024). Designing around NATO’s deterrence: Russia’s Nordic information confrontation strategy. Journal of Strategic Studies, 47(3), 410. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2024.2332328

Fisher, S., Klein, G. R., Pupcenoks, J., & Codjo, J. (2025). China, DIME, and innovative deterrence methodology: How authoritarian states react to deterrence activities through information. European Journal of International Security. https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2025.10021

Flynn, B. (2021). The coming high-tech Sino-American War at Sea? Naval Guns, Technology hybridity and the “Shock of the Old.” Defence Studies, 21(3), 312. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2021.1924688

Gholz, E., & Sapolsky, H. M. (2021). The defense innovation machine: Why the U.S. will remain on the cutting edge. Journal of Strategic Studies, 44(6), 854. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2021.1917392

Haas, M., Haesebrouck, T., Taghon, S., & Vindevogel, B. (2026). European threat perceptions after Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine: The end of "strategic cacophony"? Contemporary Security Policy, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2026.2687095

Horowitz, M. C., & Pindyck, S. (2023). What is a military innovation and why it matters. Journal of Strategic Studies, 46(1), 85–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2022.2038572

Hung, T. C., & Hung, T. W. (2022). How China’s Cognitive Warfare Works: A Frontline Perspective of Taiwan’s Anti-Disinformation Wars. Journal of Global Security Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogac016

Inkiriwang, F. W. (2021). Multilateral Naval Exercise Komodo: Enhancing Indonesia’s Multilateral Defence Diplomacy? Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 40(3), 418. https://doi.org/10.1177/18681034211008905

Koga, K. (2026). ASEAN’s Institutional Strategic Partnerships in the Indo-Pacific. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs. https://doi.org/10.1177/18681034261437415

Kormych, B., Malyarenko, T., & Wittke, C. (2023). Rescaling the legal dimensions of grey zones: Evidence from Ukraine. Global Policy, 14(3), 516–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13233

Kuo, K. (2022). Dangerous changes: When military innovation harms combat effectiveness. International Security, 47(2), 48–87. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00446

Libiseller, C. (2023). ‘Hybrid warfare’ as an academic fashion. Journal of Strategic Studies, 46(4), 858–880. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2023.2177987

Liden, R. C., Wang, X., & Wang, Y. (2024). The evolution of leadership: Past insights, present trends, and future directions. Journal of Business Research, 186, 115036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115036

Liu, D., & Shao, L. (2024). Nationalist propaganda and support for war in an authoritarian context: Evidence from China. Journal of Peace Research, 61(6), 985–1001. https://doi.org/10.1177/00223433231178849

Morejón-Llamas, N., Martín-Ramallal, P., & Micaletto-Belda, J. P. (2022). Twitter content curation as an antidote to hybrid warfare during Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. El Profesional de La Información, 31(3), e310308. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2022.may.08

Maschmeyer, L. (2026). Deception and Detection: Why Artificial Intelligence Empowers Cyber Defense over Offense. International Security, 50(3), 86. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.a.398

Matthews, R., & Timur, F. B. (2023). Singapore’s ’Total Defence’ Strategy. Defence and Peace Economics, 35(5), 638. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2023.2187924

Matthews, R., Maharani, C., Jupriyanto, & Wu, S. S. (2025). Indonesia’s defense acquisition strategy. Asian Security, 21(2), 125. https://doi.org/10.1080/14799855.2025.2527088

Montolalu, R. R. K., Perwita, A. A. B., & Sudibyo. (2023). The operational impacts of the U.S.–Indonesia strategic partnership on the joint military exercises Garuda Shield. Indonesian Journal of International Relations, 7(2), 212–240. https://doi.org/10.32787/ijir.v7i2.459

Montasser, D., Prijadi, R., & Balqiah, T. E. (2023). The Mediating Effect of IT-Enabled Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Readiness on the Relationship Between Transformational Leadership and Digital Business Model Innovation: Evidence From Indonesia Incumbent Firms. SAGE Open, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231181588

Mumford, A., & Carlucci, P. (2023). Hybrid warfare: The continuation of ambiguity by other means. European Journal of International Security. https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2022.19

Nguyen, H. T. (2023). Law and (Dis)order in the South China Sea: Analyzing Maritime Law-Enforcement Activities in 2010–22. Asia Policy, 18(2), 127. https://doi.org/10.1353/asp.2023.0027

Paisal, I. M., & Burhanuddin, A. (2025). Latihan Super Garuda Shield dalam Perspektif Balance of Power di Indo-Pasifik. Konsensus: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi, 2(3), 154–162. https://doi.org/10.62383/konsensus.v2i3.841

Palmer, J. M., & Wilner, A. (2024). Deterrence and foreign election intervention: securing democracy through punishment, denial, and delegitimization. Journal of Global Security Studies, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogae011

Prem, B. (2026). Control-by-design? Autonomous weapons systems as technopolitical projects. Contemporary Security Policy, 47(2), 415. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2026.2635959

Putra, B. A. (2025). Prabowo and the shifts in Indonesia’s contemporary foreign policy: unboxing a leader’s Operational Code. Cogent Social Sciences, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2025.2545580

Rakhmani, I., & Saraswati, M. S. (2021). Authoritarian Populism in Indonesia: The Role of the Political Campaign Industry in Engineering Consent and Coercion. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 40(3), 436. https://doi.org/10.1177/18681034211027885

Rauta, V., & Monaghan, S. (2021). Global Britain in the grey zone: Between stagecraft and statecraft. Contemporary Security Policy, 42(4), 475. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2021.1980984

Riggio, R. E., & Newstead, T. (2023). Crisis leadership. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10, 201–224. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-044838

Severini, J., & Biddle, S. (2026). Technology, Behavior, and Effectiveness in Naval Warfare: The Battles of Savo Island and Cape Saint George. International Security, 50(3), 156. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.a.401

Singh, A., Lim, W. M., Jha, S., Kumar, S., & Ciasullo, M. V. (2023). The state of the art of strategic leadership. Journal of Business Research, 158, 113676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113676

Wrange, J., Bengtsson, R., & Brommesson, D. (2024). Resilience through total defence: Towards a shared security culture in the Nordic–Baltic region? European Journal of International Security, 9(4), 511–532. https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2024.15

Wuthnow, J., & Fravel, M. T. (2022). China’s military strategy for a ‘new era’: Some change, more continuity, and tantalizing hints. Journal of Strategic Studies, 46(6–7), 1149–1184. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2022.2043850

Peraturan Perundang-undangan

Republik Indonesia. (2002). Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2002 tentang Pertahanan Negara. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2002 Nomor 3.

Republik Indonesia. (2023). Peraturan Presiden Nomor 47 Tahun 2023 tentang Strategi Keamanan Siber Nasional dan Manajemen Krisis Siber. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2023 Nomor 99.

Republik Indonesia. (2025). Peraturan Presiden Nomor 111 Tahun 2025 tentang Kebijakan Umum Pertahanan Negara Tahun 2025–2029.