The Influence of the Quality of Passport Production Services on Community Satisfaction at Class II Imgration offices Atambua Immigration Check Places

Authors

  • Donatus Gin FATIN Nusa Cendana University, Kupang, Indonesia.
  • Aloysius LILIWERI Nusa Cendana University, Indonesia
  • Melkisedek N.B.C. NEOLAKA Nusa Cendana University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38142/jtep.v4i1.955

Keywords:

Service Quality, Community Satisfaction, Passport

Abstract

This research describes the quality of passport-making services at the TPI Atambua Class II Immigration Office. This research focuses on passport-making services because they have the most applicants. This problem occurs because passport completion exceeds standards and employee information is unclear. This research was a quantitative descriptive study with 96 respondents, using purposive and incidental nonprobability sampling models. The research results show that the quality of service on community satisfaction at the TPI Atambua Class II Immigration Office has a value of 0.463, which means (46.30%). Obtained from five dimensions of service quality, such as physical evidence of (0.139), reliability dimension (0.126), responsiveness dimension (0.007), assurance dimension (0.096), and empathy dimension of (0.120). The simultaneous test shows an F-count of 11.255, confirming the significant relationship between the five dimensions of service quality and community satisfaction. This research suggests that the five dimensions of service quality simultaneously have a significant effect on community satisfaction at the TPI Atambua Class II Immigration Office "accepted." The coefficient of determination reveals that service quality and community satisfaction together have a strong influence (46.30%) at the TPI Atambua Class II Immigration Office, with the remainder influenced by factors not explained. The results of research and hypothesis testing show that service quality (X) and community satisfaction (Y) together have quite a strong influence on the TPI Atambua Class II Immigration Office, amounting to 46.30%, while the remaining 53.70% is influenced by other factors not explained in this research.

References

Akabar dan Frinaldi, 2023. Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Aplikasi M-Paspor terhadap Kepuasan Pengguna Jasa Keimigrasian Pada Kantor Imigrasi Kelas II Non TPI Agam. Jurnal of Public Administration Studiies. https://publicness.ppj.undp.ac.id- Vol. 2 No. 1, 2023.

Apriyani, D. A, dan Sunarti. 2017. Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Terhadap Kepuasan Konsumen (Survei pada Konsumen The Little A Coffe Shop Sidoarjo), Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis (JAB), 51(12), 1-7.

Barnes, 2003. Secret of Customer Relationship Management (Rahasia Manajemen Hubungan Pelanggan). Yogyakarta : Penerbit Andi.

DIRJENIM Tahun 2006, Tentang Inovasi Layanan Paspor Republik Indonesia.

Dwiyanto, 2006. Mewujudkan Good Governance Melayani Publik. Yogyakarta, UGM Press.

Fred dan Benu A., 2019. Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif : Ekonomi, Sosiologi, Komunikasi, Administrasi, Pertanian, dan lainnya. Edisi Pertama, Cetakan Kedua. Jakarta, Penerbit : Kencana.

Ghozali, 2008. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program SPSS. Edisi Ketiga. Semarang : Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Hasan, 2002. Pokok-Pokok Materi Metodologi Penelitian dan Aplikasinya. Jakarta : Galilia, Indonesia.

Helpiastuti, Syaifanna dan Rohman, 2023. Kualitas Pelayanan M-Paspor Di Kantor Imigrasi Kelas I TPI Jember. Jurnal : Manajemen Publik dan Kebijakan Sosial - Vol. 7 No. 1 Tahun 2023

Kotler, 2009, Manajemen Pemasaran, Jilid I, Edisi Kedua belas, PT. Indeks, Jakarta.

Lewis dan Booms, 1983. The Marketing Aspect of Services Quality in Berry, L., Shostack, G. and Upah, G. (eds). Emerging prespectives on services Marketing : American Marketing Association Chigaco.

Likert, 1932. A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes, Archives of Pshychologi.

Mahmudi, 2007. Manajemen Kinerja Sektor Publik. Yogyakarta, UPP STIM YKPN.

Maya Sari, 2023. Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Terhadap Kepuasan Masyarakat Pada Kantor Imigrasi Kelas II Non TPI Meulaboh. Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Terpadu. Vol. 3 No. 1, 2023.

McGregor, 1960. The Human Side of Enterprices New York McGraw-Hill.

Neolaka Melkisedek N.B.C, 2003. Otonomi Daerah dan Problematikan Pelayanan Publik oleh Birokrasi Daerah. Jurnal Administrasi Publik. Volume 1, Nomor 2.

Parasuraman dan Berry 2003. Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Terhadap Kepercayaan” vol. 21 24-30 (Januari 2003).

Pelawi, Efendi dan Ginting, 2022. Pengukuran Kualitas Pelayanan Terhadap Kepuasan Pembuatan Paspor di Kantor Imigrasi Kelas 1 Polonia Medan. Jurnal : Wira Ekonomi Mikroskil : ISSN 2622-6421. Volume 12, Nomor 02, Oktober 2022.

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 25 Tahun 2019 Tentang Pelayanan Publik.

Ridwan. 2012. Metode dan Teknik Menyusun roposal Penelitian. Bandung : Alfabeta

Sinambela, 2005. Reformasi Pelayanan Publik. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Sugiyono. 2015. Metode Penelitian Administrasi, Buku 1. Bandung : CV. Alfabeta.

....... 2019. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif dan R dan D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

....... 2017. Metode Penelitian Pendekatan Kuantitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sumaryadi, 2010. Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Otonom dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Jakarta, Penerbit : Citra Utamma.

Tahir, Sri Maulidiah, 2014. Pelayanan Publik (Pelayanan Administrasi Terpadu Kecamatan). Bandung, Indra Prahasta.

Tjiptono dan Chandra “ Quality and Satisfaction” edis 3 tahun 2011. Yogyakarta: Andi.

Wawuru dan Beby, 2016. Efektifitas Pelayanan Paspor Pada Kantor Imigrasi Kelas I Khusus Medan. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 4 (1).

Wati, Setiasih. (2006). Hubungan Antara Kepuasan Kerja Perawat dan Kepuasan Klien di Rumaah Sakit Husada Jakarta. Depok. Fakultas Ilmu Keperawatan Universitas Indonesia.

Yogi, dan Trihardianto, 2018. Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Administrasi Dalam Pembuatan Pasport Terhadap Kepuasan Masyarakat di Kantor Imigrasi Kelas 1 Malang. Jurnal : Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik ISSN. 2442-6962. Vol. 7, No. 2 (2018)

Downloads

Published

2024-01-31