The Influence of Problem Characteristics, Regulatory and Non-Regulatory Supporting Capabilities on The Process of Implementing E-Learning Online Learning Policies at Nusa Cendana University

Authors

  • Piter LY Nusa Cendana University, Kupang, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia.
  • Ajis Salim Adang DJAHA Nusa Cendana University, Indonesia
  • William DJANI Nusa Cendana University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38142/jtep.v3i4.865

Keywords:

problem characteristics, regulatory carrying capacity, non-regulatory carrying capacity, implementation process, e-learning

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the influence of problem characteristic factors, regulatory and non-regulatory carrying capacity on the implementation process of e-learning based online learning policies at Nusa Cendana University. This type of research uses a positivism paradigm with a quantitative approach, where to obtain the truth of the data, direct interviews are conducted with the object under study. The sample used in this research was 467 people who were lecturers and students at Nusa Cendana University. Research data was analyzed using descriptive statistical tests and PLS-SEM inferential statistics. The results obtained show that descriptively the four variables received a good category response with indicators of problem characteristic factors reaching 73.28%, regulatory carrying capacity of 78.27%, non-regulatory carrying capacity of 77.11% and the e-learning implementation process of 75.05%. Hypothesis testing shows that the problem characteristic factor has a significant positive influence (p<0.05) directly at 18.4% and through non-regulatory carrying capacity at 48.3% but through regulatory carrying capacity at only 5.3% it does not have a significant influence (p>0.05) towards the process of implementing e-learning based online learning policies at Nusa Cendana University. The results of the determinant test show that the problem characteristic factors have a significant moderate/moderate influence (p<0.05) through regulatory carrying capacity of 50.2% and through non-regulatory carrying capacity of 53.0% but together/simultaneously they give a strong influence of 75.3% while 24.7% was influenced by other factors outside this research.

References

A. G Subarsono, 2005. Analisis Kebijakan Publik Konsep, Teori dan Aplikasi. Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta.

Anderson, T. 2008. The Theory and Practice of Online Learning. Second. Edition.

AU Press Canada. Athabasca University

Bariyah, S. H., & Imania, K. A. N. (2018). Implementasi Blended Learning Berbasis Moodle Pada Jurusan Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi. Jurnal Petik, 4(2), 106–113. https://doi.org/10.31980/jpetik.v4i2.10

Batinggi, Ahmad. 1998. Manajemen Pelayanan Umum. STIA LAN, Jakarta. Boediono. (2000). Ekonomi Mikro. BPFE-Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta

Dunn, W. N. 1998. Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Publik. Gadjah Mada University Press, Jakarta.

Dye, Thomas R. 1978. Understanding Public Policy. Prentice Hall, N.J: Englewood Cliffs.

Dwiyanto, A. 1999. “Penilaian Kinerja Organisasi Pelayanan Publik”. Makalah Seminar Kinerja Organisasi Sektor Publik Kebijakan dan Persiapannya. Jurusan Ilmu Administrasi Negara FISIPOL UGM, Yogyakarta.

Effendy, O. U. 2000. Ilmu Komunikasi: Teori dan Praktek. PT. Remaja Rosda Karya, Bandung.

Frederickson, H. George. 1980. New public Administration. The University Of Alabana Press, Alabama.

Ghozali, I. 2009. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS. Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang..

Ghozali, I. 2014. Partial Least Squares Konsep, Teknik dan Aplikasi Mengguanakan Program SmartPLS 3.0. Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.

Ghozali, I. 2016. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariete Dengan Program IBM SPSS 23.

Edisi 8. Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.

Hadisi, L dan W. Muna, 2015. Pengelolaan Teknologi Informasi Dalam Menciptakan Model Inovasi Pembelajaran (E-Learning). Jurnal Al-Ta’dib Vol. 8 No. 1, Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Ilmu Keguruan IAIN, Kendari.

Ratminto dan A. S. Winarsih. 2005. Manajemen Pelayanan. Pustaka Pelajar.

Yogyakarta.

Hoogerwerf, A. 1983. Ilmu Pemerintahan. Cetakan Pertama, Erlangga, Jakarta.

Keputusan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara Nomor : 63/KEP/M.PAN/7/2003 Tentang Pedoman Umum Penyelenggaraan Pelayanan Publik.

Kristiadi, J.B. 1994. Administrasi manajemen pembangunan. Subag.TU LAN- BKKBN, Jakarta.

Levis, L. Rafael. 2013. Metode Penelitian Perilaku Petani. Penerbit Ledalero, Maumere.

Lukman, S. 2000. Manajemen Kualitas Pelayanan. STIA-LAN Press, Jakarta. Mazmanian, D, H., dan Paul, A, Sabatier, 1986, Implementation and Public Policy.

Harper Collins, New York.

Munir, 2008. Kurikulum Berbasis Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi, Bandung: Alfabeta.

Noor, Juliansyah. 2014. Metode Penelitian. Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta.

Nugroho, Riant, 2003. Kebijakan Publik: Formulasi, Implementasi dan Evaluasi.

PT Elek Media Kompotindo, Jakarta.

Pannen, P. 2005. Pendidikan Sebagai Sistem. PAU-PPAI, Universitas Terbuka.

Jakarta.

Parsons, Wayne. 1997. Public Policy: Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis (Tri Wibowo Budi Santoso, Penerjemah). Kencana Prenada Media Group. Jakarta.

Pasolong, Harbani. 2007. Teori Administrasi Publik. Alfabeta, Bandung. Purwanto, E. A. dan D. R. Sulistyastuti. 2012. Implementasi Kebijakan Publik.

Konsep dan Aplikasinya di Indonesia. Gava Media, Yokyakarta.

Quade, E.S. 1984. Analysis For Public Decisions, Elsevier Science Publishers, New York.

Salusu, J. 1996. Pengambilan Keputusan Strategik untuk Organisasi Publik dan Organisasi non Profit. PT Grasindo. Jakarta.

Setiaman, S. 2022. Tutorial Analisa Parsial Model Persamaan Struktural. Dengan Software SMART PLS Versi 3 untuk Tenaga Kesehatan. Edisi ke-3. Doha, Qatar.

Setyoningsih. 2015. E Learning: Pembelajaran Interaktif Berbasis Teknologi Informasi. Jurnal Elementary, 3 (1): 39-58.

Sinambela. 2010. Reformasi Pelayanan Publik. Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.

Soekartawi. 2003. Prinsip Dasar e-Learning: Teori dan Aplikasinya di Indonesia.

Jurnal Teknodik. Edisi No.12/VII/Oktober/2003.

Sugiyono. 2013. Metode Penelitian Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R dan D. Alfabeta, Bandung.

Surjono, H. D. (2013). Membangun Course E - Learning Berbasis Moodle (2nd ed.). UNY PRESS

Surya, Muhammad. 2006. Potensi TIK dalam Peningkatan Mutu Pembelajaran di Kelas, Makalah, Pustekkom; Depdiknas, Jakarta.

Tjiptono. (2003). Total Quality Management. Edisi Revisi, Andi, Yogyakarta. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem

Pendidikan Nasional

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 2012 tentang Pendidikan Tinggi

Wahab, A. Solichin. 1997. Analisis Kebijaksanaan dari Formulasi ke Implementasi Kebijaksanaan Negara. PT. Bumi Aksara, Jakarta

Wahono, Romi Satria. 2008. “Definisi dan Komponen E-learning”. [online], http://romisatriawahono.net/2008/01/23/meluruskan-salah-kaprah- tentang-e-learning: 7 April 2022

Wibawa, Samudra, 1994, Evaluasi Kebijakan Publik, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta

Widodo, J. 2001. Etika Birokrasi Dalam Pelayanan Publik. Citra, Malang. Winarno, Budi. 2002. Kebijakan Publik: Teori dan Proses. Media Pressindo.

Yogyakarta.

Yamin, S dan H. Kurniawan. 2011. Generasi Baaru Mengolah Data Penelitian Dengan Partial Least Square Path Modeling: Aplikasi dengan Software XLSTAT, SmartPLS, dan VisualPLS. Salemba Infotek, Jakarta

Yuwono, Teguh dan Badjuri, Abdulkahar. 2002. Kebijakan Publik Konsep dan Strategi. Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-31

Most read articles by the same author(s)