The Concept of Corporate Social Responsibility in Higher Education Institutions in Perspective Ketadulakoan

Mohammad Iqbal  BAKRY; Muliati  MULIATI; Jurana JURANA; Muhammad  RIDWAN

doi:10.38142/ijesss.v5i4.1115

Authors

Mohammad Iqbal BAKRY Tadulako University, Indonesia
Muliati MULIATI Tadulako University, Indonesia
Jurana JURANA Tadulako University, Indonesia
Muhammad RIDWAN Tadulako University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38142/ijesss.v5i4.1115

Keywords:

University Social Responsibility, Ketadulakoan, Higher Education, Critical

Abstract

This research aims to reconstruct the concept of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Higher Education Institutions (or University Social Responsibility) from a religious perspective. The Critical Paradigm is used as a paradigm for developing this research. Interviews, observation and documentation carried out data collection. Informants were selected based on the credibility of the researcher. Data analysis was carried out by reconstructing the concept of CSR in higher education institutions (USRs) based on religious values. The findings of this research are the philosophy of Tadulakoan to dismantle the values ??of secularism, materialism and individualism in the implementation of USR in Tadulako. The research results found accountability in the form of reporting related to 1) Level of courage (Natona Nalanggai) in fighting for justice to achieve peace, 2) Ability to achieve success through collaboration of various intelligences, 3) Fighting power in achieving success. 4) Excellence (Nabaraka) in creating innovations to ease human life. 5) Accuracy and caution (Nompangila) in decision-making. 6) Obedience and loyalty (Natuvu No Sangata) to leaders who fulfill their mandate. 7) Level of democracy in joint decision-making activities, 8) Awareness in protecting community interests and the environment. This research can be one of the research that supports and is in line with the Strategic Plan and research road map achieved by Tadulako University (UNTAD).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmar, N., & Kamayanti, A. (2011). Unmasking the Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting. Asian CSR and Sustainability Review, 1(1), 65.

Bojonegoro, I., & Rizkylorojiwo. (2013). Topeng Bernama CSR. Available at: http://asylum87.blogspot.com/2013/03/topeng-bernama-csr.html (Accessed: 20 May 2015).

Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis: Elements of The Sociology of Corporate Life. Heinemann Educational Books, London

Carroll, A. B. (1991). The Pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G

Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: Capstone's triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.3310080106

Eriandani, M. R. (2022). The Value Relevance of Quantity and Quality of Sustainability Reporting: Evidence from Indonesia. JIA (Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi), 7(1), 40–59. https://doi.org/10.23887/jia.v7i1.41533

Fanny, E. (2010). Open Mind. Erika HousePublisher. The USA.

Galan, J. I. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility and Strategic Management. Journal of Management Studies, p. 43, 1629–1641. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00655.x

Gallhofer, S., & Haslam, J. (2011). Emancipation, the Spiritual and Accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 22(5), 500-509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2011.01.006

Gets Up, F. 2015. The Colourful Mask of Corporate Social Responsibility. Available at: https://frankiewantstoknow.wordpress.com/2015/05/28/the-colourful-mask-of- corporate-social-responsibility/

Harper. R. (1904). The Code of Hammurabi, King of Babylon, About 2250 B.C. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago. pp. 1-434 https://doi.org/10.1086/369501

James. (2007). Sistem Informasi Akuntansi. Terjemahan Dewi Fitriasari. Salemba Empat. Jakarta.

Jurana, J., Bakry, M. I., Indriasar, R., Parwati, N. M. S., Mapparessa, N., & Ridwan, M. (2024). Revealing the Accountability of Tadulako University as a Step to Realizing Sustainable Development Goals. International Journal of Environmental, Sustainability, and Social Science, 5(1), 01-08. https://doi.org/10.38142/ijesss.v5i1.897

Karsten, H. E., Wong, H. Y., & Hermawan, J. N. (2024). IMC Preferences in BMC School Gresik. International Journal of Environmental, Sustainability, and Social Science, 5(3), 452-459. https://doi.org/10.38142/ijesss.v5i3.977

Keraf, A. S. (2014). Filsafat Lingkungan Hidup: Alam Sebagai Sebuah Sistem Kehidupan Bersama Fritjof Capra. PT Kanisius, Yogyakarta.

Kramer, M. R., & Porter, M. E. (2006). Strategy and Society: The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78-92.

Macmillan, L. H. (2003). Behind the Mask: The Natural Face of Corporate Social Responsibility.

Nur, F., & Ekaviana, D. (2020). Circle Bottom Line?: Mengkonstruksi Akuntansi Sosial Lingkungan Dalam Bingkai Spirtualitas. Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, Dan Akuntansi Islam, 5(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.34202/imanensi.5.1.2020.17-24

Peursen, C. A. (1988). Strategi Kebudayaan, diterjemahkan oleh Dick Hartoko, dari buku "Cultur in Stroomversnelling" Kanisius. Yogyakarta.

Peursen, C. A. (2003). Menjadi Filsuf: Suatu Pendorong ke Arah Berfilsafat Sendiri, diterjemahkan oleh Fitra Salam, dari buku "Wegwijs in de Wijsbegeerte: Een Aansporing tot Zelf Filosoferen". CV. Qalam. Yogyakarta.

Rumambi, H. (2014). Konsep Dasar Tanggungjawab Sosial Perusahaan dalam Perspektif Ajaran Sosial Gereja Katolik (Studi pada PT. Indofood CBP Sukses Makmur Tbk Cabang Manado) (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Brawijaya).

Sanerya, H. (2009). Spiritual Management: From Personel Enlightenment Towards God Corporate Governance. Bandung: PT Mizan Publika.

Sukoharsono, E. G. (2010). Metamorfosis Akuntansi Sosial dan Lingkungan: Mengkonstruksi Akuntansi Sustainabilitas Berdimensi Spiritualitas. Pidato Pengukuhan Guru Besar 13 Desember 2010, 1–24.

Sukoharsono, E. G. (2019). Sustaining a Sustainability Report by Modifying Triple Bottom Line to Pentaple Bottom Line: An Imaginary Research Dialogue. The International Journal of Accounting and Business Society, 27(1), 119-127. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.ijabs.2019.27.1.7

Sukoharsono, E. G. (2019). The Carroll Pyramid Perspective in Analyzing The Implementation of CSR: The Case of Pupuk Kaltim Fertilizer Company, The International Conference on Economics and Business Management (ICEBM), Florence, Italy, 19-20 Agustus 2019.

Sukoharsono, E. G. (2019). The Contributions of Pupuk KALTIM to SDGS: A Postmodernism Analysis Based on The Performance of Sustainability Reports, The International Meeting of University Cooperation at the Universiti Teknologi Mara, Malaysia, Malaysia, 16-19 September 2019.

Triyuwono, I. (2016). Taqwa: Deconstructing Triple Bottom Line (TBL) to awaken human’s divine consciousness. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 24, 89-104.

Uhi, J. A., (2016). Filsafat Kebudayaan, Konstruksi Pemikiran Cornelis Anthonie van Peursen dan Catatan Reflektifnya.Pustaka Pelajar. Yogyakarta. pp. 99

Walton, C. (1967). Corporate Social Responsibility. Wadsworth.Belmont.

Wartini, S. (2017). Model Kebijakan Hukum Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan di Indonesia. JH Lus Quia Iustum, 24(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol24.iss1.art1