Strengthening Financial Accountability through Administrative Governance Reform: Capacity Building for BUMDes Administrators in Bacan

Authors

  • Suriana AR Mahdi Universitas Khairun, Indonesia
  • Rusman Soleman Universitas Khairun, Indonesia
  • Septy Indra Santoso Universitas Khairun, Indonesia
  • Meliana Universitas Khairun, Indonesia
  • Mahardika Catur Putriwana Malik Universitas Khairun, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38142/ahjpm.v5i1.1769

Keywords:

BUMDes, administrative governance, financial accountability, capacity building, village economy

Abstract

Village-Owned Enterprises (BUMDes) are strategic policy instruments designed to promote village economic independence, increase village original income, and optimize the sustainable use of local potential. This community service program aims to analyze the implementation of administrative governance reforms to strengthen the financial accountability of Village-Owned Enterprises (BUMDes) in Bacan through a capacity-building approach. The main problems faced by BUMDes are weak administrative systems and limited managerial capacity in financial recording and reporting. The community service method uses a participatory approach that involves training and mentoring BUMDes managers. The results of the community service program indicate that administrative governance reforms contribute significantly to increasing BUMDes financial transparency and accountability. This community service program emphasizes the importance of strengthening institutional capacity as an initial strategy in realizing professional and sustainable BUMDes.  The key findings of this service demonstrate that prior to the intervention, weaknesses in BUMDes' financial accountability were not solely due to limited capital or business scale, but rather to the low quality of administrative governance and the human resource capacity of managers.

References

Chemmaa, A., Ibrahimi, M., & Amine, M. (2025). Earnings management and corporate governance in Africa: Sustainable development, challenges, and policy recommendations. Corporate Governance and Sustainability Review, 9(4), 68. https://doi.org/10.22495/cgsrv9i4p6

Kementerian Desa, Pembangunan Daerah Tertinggal, dan Transmigrasi. (2020). Pedoman Pengelolaan Badan Usaha Milik Desa. Jakarta: Kemendes PDTT.

Mardiasmo. (2018). Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Yogyakarta: Andi.

Okeke, R. C., & Nwankpa, L. O. (2018). Financial accountability, ethical issues, and organizational citizenship behavior in fragile economic systems: The case of the Nigerian economy. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ac.2018.2.001

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2015). Public Governance and Integrity. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2015.

Primer, A. U. United Nations Development Programme Capacity Development: A UNDP Primer. Public Awareness and Public Education for Disaster Risk Reduction: A Guide.

Republik Indonesia. (2021). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 11 Tahun 2021 tentang Badan Usaha Milik Desa.

Schnell, S., & Jo, S. (2019). Which countries have more open governments? Assessing structural determinants of openness. The American Review of Public Administration, 49(8), 944-956. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074019854445

Sutaryo, S. D. (2018). Tata kelola dan akuntabilitas keuangan Badan Usaha Milik Desa. J Akunt Sektor Publik. 5(2):45–58.

Suryanto, T., & Thalassinos, I. E. (2017). Governance and accountability in public sector organizations. Int J Econ Bus Adm. 5(3):17–33.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-28

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.