Audit Plan as an Instrument to Improve the Effectiveness of Tax Audits
Keywords:
Audit Plan, Tax Audit, Effectiveness, Competent EvidenceAbstract
Tax audits are an integral part of implementing the self-assessment system. The tax audit phase begins with preparatory activities, such as developing an audit plan. The audit plan encompasses several activities that must be carried out as a guideline for conducting tax audits. This study aims to determine the role of audit plans in improving the effectiveness of tax audits, particularly during the planning stage. This research used a descriptive qualitative approach, involving in-depth interviews with tax auditors and data analysis using the NVivo application. The results indicate that problem identification has been developed for each audit assignment based on available data and information. A risk-based audit plan strategy is implemented to direct the audit focus and ensure the application of methods, techniques, and procedures to obtain competent and sufficient evidence. The use of technology, such as the Derik application, facilitates audit plan development and more structured risk identification. Currently, detailed and focused audit plans help improve audit effectiveness by providing a deterrent effect and successfully obtaining competent and sufficient audit evidence that can be accounted for in the event of a tax dispute. However, the audit team's utilization of audit plans is still suboptimal, impacting audit effectiveness. This study recommends strengthening the implementation of risk-based audit plans and optimizing technology in tax audits.
References
Andri, M. W. (2021). Efektivitas pemeriksaan pajak di indonesia. . Balance: Jurnal akuntansi dan bisnis, 6(1), 41-54.
Antle, R. (1982). The Auditor As an Economic Agent. . Journal of Accounting Research, 20(2), , 503–527. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2490884.
Arens, R. J. (2010). .Auditing dan Jasa Assurance. . Jakarta : Penerbit Erlangga. .
Bakti, I. T. (2010). Pengaruh penerapan sistem self assessment terhadap optimalisasi penerimaan PPh pasal 25 wajib pajak badan: studi kasus pada KPP pratama Jakarta Kramat Jati. repository.uinjkt.ac.id, 1-88.
Bedard, J. e. (1991). A multiple criteria model for audit planning decisions. . Contemporary Accounting Research, , 8(1), 293-308, doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1991.tb00846.x.
Chalu, H. &. (2018). Determinants of tax audit effectiveness in Tanzania. . Managerial Auditing Journal, , 33(1), 35-63.
Davidson, R. A. (1996). Empirical Evidence on the Functional Relation between Audit Planning and Total Audit Effort. . Journal of Accounting Research, , 34(1), 111–124. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2491334.
Dina K. Sari, e. a. (2022). Pengaruh Edukasi, Pengawasan Dan Pemeriksaan Pajak Terhadap Peningkatan Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Di KPP Pratama Surabaya Genteng. journal.universitaspahlawan.ac.id, 6304–6320. doi:https://doi.org/10.31004/jpdk.v4i6.9293
Gunadi. (2020). Pemeriksaan, Investigasi dan Penyidikan Pajak . Jakarta : MUC Consulting.
Heykal, M., Prasetya, S., & Harsanti, P. S. (2024). Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan terhadap Kepuasan Pelanggan pada Jasa Wisata (Open Trip) CV Tidung Island. Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen Akuntansi, 30(1), 250-265. https://doi.org/10.59725/ema.v30i1.226
Kasper, M. &. (2022). Audits, audit effectiveness, and post-audit tax compliance. . Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, , 195, 87-102.
Kementerian Keuangan. 2013. Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 17/PMK.03/2013 tentang Tata cara Pemeriksaan Pajak sebagaimana telah diubah terakhir dengan Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 184 Tahun 2015 tentang tata cara pemeriksaan.
Meliala, A. A. (2015). Tinjauan Terhadap Prosedur Pembenaran Faktur Pajak Pada Kpp Madya Kota Bandung. elibrary.unikom.ac.id, 1-35.
Nehme, R. (2013). Dynamics of audit quality : behavioural approach and governance framework : . UK evidence.
Nugrahanto, A. (2018). Apakah Pemeriksaan Sudah Membuat Wajib Pajak Gentar? . Jurnal Pajak Indonesia (JPI), 53–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.31092/jpi.v2i1.527
Polinsky, A. M. (2000). The Economic Theory of Public Enforcement of Law. . Journal of Economic Literature, 38(1), , 45–76. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2565359.
Polinsky, A. M. (2007). The Theory of Public Enforcement of Law. . Handbook of Law and Economics, , 1, 403-454, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0730(07)01006-7.
Prentice, R. (2000). The case of the irrational auditor: A behavioral insight into securities fraud litigation. . Northwestern University law review, , 95(1), 133-219.
Riyadi, S. P. (2021). Pengaruh Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak, Pemeriksaan Pajak, dan Pemungutan Pajak terhadap Penerimaan Pajak Penghasilan Badan. . JRAP (Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Perpajakan), , 8(2), 206-216. .
Rizal, H. Z. (2022). Penerapan compliance risk management (crm) engine dalam pemeriksaan pajak di Indonesia. . jurnal ekonomi, , 18(2), 96-115.
Romadhaniah, I. &. (2019). Menakar Efektifitas Penegakan Hukum dalam meningkatkan Kepatuhan Pajak di Indonesia . Direktorat Jenderal Pajak.
Ruchmawati, R. (2016). Analisis Perencanaan Audit Laporan Keuangan Berdasarkan Standar Profesional Akuntan Publik (Studi Kasus pada KAP Ariesman Auly, Drs. . Jurnal Berkala Ilmiah Efisiensi, , 16(3).
Sari, M. M. (2012). Pengaruh Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Dan Pemeriksaan Pajak Terhadap Penerimaan Pph Pasal 25/29 Wajib Pajak Badan Pada Kpp Pratama Denpasar Timur. . Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Bisnis, , 7(2), 1-21. .
Sugiyono, D. (2018). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suprajadi, L. (2009). Teori kecurangan, fraud awareness dan metodologi untuk mendeteksi kecurangan pelaporan keuangan. Bina Ekonomi, 13(2)., 13(2).
Tobing, E. G. (2022). Modernisasi Administrasi Perpajakan: NIK Menjadi NPWP. . Jurnal Pajak Indonesia (Indonesian Tax Review), , 6(2), 183-193.
Udayani, A. A. (2017). Pengaruh pengendalian internal dan moralitas individu pada kecenderungan kecurangan akuntansi. . E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, , 18(3), 1744-1799.
Westaby, J. (2005). Behavioral reasoning theory: Identifying new linkages underlying intentions and behavior. . Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,, 98 (2), pp. 97-120, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.07.003.
Yulianto, A. R. (2023). Tinjauan Yuridis Pemeriksaan Pajak. www.proquest.com, 1-24.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 I Gede Komang Chahya Bayu Anta KUSUMA, Irwan ARIBOWO, Supriyadi SUPRIYADI , Jai KUMAR, Niswatun Nurul KAMILAH

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.