Criteria and Conditions for Determining an Act of Robbery Reviewed from a Criminal Law Perspective

Ni Kadek Erika MANGGALA; I Nyoman BAGIASTRA

doi:10.38142/pjlel.v2i1.1059

Authors

Ni Kadek Erika MANGGALA Universitas Udayana
I Nyoman BAGIASTRA Udayana University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38142/pjlel.v2i1.1059

Keywords:

Theft, Robbery, Law

Abstract

This research aims to determine the legal comparison of criminal acts of theft and mugging or robbery based on the provisions of Indonesian criminal law. It also helps to understand the requirements and influence of interpretation for the legal determination of criminal acts such as robbery from a legal perspective. This type of research is normative legal research, specifically discussing theft and robbery. The data collection method used in this research is a literature study that reviews literature related to the object of this research. The research results show that the comparison between the Crime of theft and not the Crime of robbery lies in using the article regulations. Suppose the Crime of theft is regulated in Article 362 of the Criminal Code. Meanwhile, Article 365 of the Criminal Code regulates the Crime of robbery. Article 365 of the Criminal Code provides a strong legal basis for criminalizing and punishing perpetrators of criminal acts of theft with violence. Correct legal interpretation of Article 365 of the Criminal Code is very important to ensure fair and effective law enforcement against perpetrators of these criminal acts.

References

Anugrah, Roby, & Raja Desril. (2021). “Kebijakan Formulasi Pidana Mati Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia.” Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 3: halaman 80-95 Program. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v3i1.80-95

Darmawan, Rama, & Andri Wahyudi. (2022). “Tindak Pidana Pencurian Dalam Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Pidana Indonesia.” Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai 6: 16208–15.

Handoko, D. (2019). “Hudud Terhadap Pencurian Dan Penodongan Atau Perampokan Dibandingkan Dengan Ketentuan Hukum Pidana Positif Indonesia.” Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Perundungan Islam 9, no. 2. https://doi.org/10.15642/ad.2019.9.2.338-359

Hosnah, Asmak Ul, Anisa Falentine, Rezkika Akila A, & Ilham Gunawan. (2023). “Tinjauan Turidis Tindak Pidana Pencurian Dengan Kekerasan Berdasarkan Pasal 365 KUHPidana.” Jurnal Fusion 3, no. 08. https://doi.org/10.54543/fusion.v3i08.349

Kelsen, P. (2006). A Declarative Executable Model for Object-Based Systems Based on Functional Decomposition. in International Conference on Software and Data Technologies (Vol. 2, pp. 63-68). SCITEPRESS.

Luthfi, Muhammad Adnan, Yulia Kurniaty, Basri Basri, & Johny Krisnan. (2019). “Studi Perbandingan Tentang Penetapan Sanksi Pidana Pencurian Berdasarkan Hukum Pidana Positif Indonesia Dan Hukum Pidana Islam,”, 20–30. https://doi.org/10.31603/6537

Setiyono, J., & Nabela, N. (2023). The Role of Government and Society in Countermeasures and Prevention of Criminal Acts of Terrorism According to Law Number 5 Of 2018. Protection: Journal Of Land And Environmental Law, 1(3), 174–180. https://doi.org/10.38142/pjlel.v1i3.660

Tambingon, R. (2016). “Perampokan Dari Sudut Tindak Pidana Pencurian Dengan Kekerasan Dan Pemerasan.” Lex Crimen V, no. 1: 138–42.

Utama, I Wayan Kartika Jaya. (2022). “Empowerment of Bupda Reform Access in Village Land Asset Management in Bali.” NOTARIIL Jurnal Kenotariatan 7, no. 1: 9–12. https://doi.org/10.22225/jn.7.1.2022.9-12

Utama, I. W. K. J., & Wiryani, M. (2023). Independent Development Model for Village Land Asset Management in Segara Kodang by Sesetan Village. Protection: Journal Of Land And Environmental Law, 1(3), 198–206. https://doi.org/10.38142/pjlel.v1i3.851

Wiganarto, T. U., Gultom, E., & Sudaryat. (2022). Use of Indirect Evidence in Disclosure of Cartel Violations According to Business Competition Law in Indonesia. Protection: Journal Of Land And Environmental Law, 1(1), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.38142/pjlel.v1i1.340

Yuserlina, A. (2020). “Peranan Polri Dalam Menanggulangi Tindak Pidana Pencurian Dengan Kekerasan Di Wilayah Hukum Polres Payakumbuh.” Ensiklopedia Social Review 2, no. 3: 314–24. https://doi.org/10.33559/esr.v2i3.630