Discursive Communication of Covid-19 Vaccination Against Anti-Vaccine Communities (Study at Semanan Subdistrict Government, DKI Jakarta Province)

Jatayu Hadi  PRAKOSO; Puji  LESTARI; Jamalullail  JAMALULLAIL

doi:10.38142/ijesss.v4i6.911

Authors

Jatayu Hadi PRAKOSO Sahid University, Indonesia
Puji LESTARI UPN “Veteran” University Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Jamalullail JAMALULLAIL Sahid University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38142/ijesss.v4i6.911

Keywords:

Humanistic Communication, Agreeableness, Truth Claim

Abstract

Indonesian society faced the Covid-19 pandemic some time ago. On February 13, 2022, the government accelerated vaccination for doses 1 to 2 with 326.62 million vaccine doses. The debate and problem that occurs is that several groups of people reject vaccination, which is called the anti-vaccination community, with responses that give rise to their respective truth claims. The truth claim is expressed in not attending the vaccine center organized by the government. This research aims to see the need for a consensus to reduce the stigma of Covid-19 vaccination in anti-vaccine communities. The gap in this research is the views of the anti-vaccine community regarding the implementation of COVID-19 vaccination in Semanan Village. The discourse approach could be more effective, especially in the anti-vaccination community in the Semanan sub-district area, DKI Jakarta Province. Discursive communication theory is used to identify this communicative action, which suggests the context of Communication, namely ego identity towards truth claim. Findings obtained that, in implementing the COVID-19 vaccination, the community formed an institution with aspects of professionalism, which impacted the implementation of the vaccine center in the Semanan sub-district area. Professionalism institutions consist of opinion leaders, medical roles, and approaches through socio-cultural and socio-religious roles. More than discursive communication competence is required. Humanistic Communication highlights the importance of adding elements of agreeableness, namely how to treat relationships with others to avoid Conflict.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abidin, Z. (2020). Pembelajaran Online Berbasis Proyek Salah Satu Solusi Kegiatan Belajar Mengajar di tengah Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 5(1), 64 – 70. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v5i1.111

Alford, R. R., & Roger, F. (1985). Powers of Theory, Capitalism, the State, and Democracy. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511598302

Ari, C. (2017). Group Communication, Discursive, and Public Space (A Case Study of a Phenomenon the Existence of Discursive Environment KIP Area of Bengkulu Province). Studi Komunikasi Media Balai Pengkajian dan Pengembangan Komunikasi.

Chakraborty, S. & Mondal, P. (2020). Importance of Biomechanics in Basketball Layup Shot. International Journal of Physical Education, Sports and Health.

Cloke, P., Philo, C. & Sadler, D. (1991). Approaching Human Geography. Stage, London.

Craig, R. T., & Heidi, L. M. (2007). Theorizing Communication Reading Across Traditions (Ed), Sage Publication: California.

Craib, I. (1986). Teori Sosiologi Modern (terj). Jakarta: CV. Rajawali.

Creswell, J. W., Vicki, L. P. C. (2007). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W. (2015). Penelitian Kualitatif & Desain Riset. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

De Fleur., & Rokeach. (1982). Theories of Mass Communication. Fourth Edition. New York and London. Longman.

Denzin, N. K., & Yvonna, S. L. (2009). Handbook of Qualitative Research. Terj. Dariyatno dkk. Jogjakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Fashri, F. (2016). Pierre Bourdieu: Menyingkap Kuasa Simbol. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra.

Griffin, R. W., & Moorhead, G. (2014). Organizational Behavior Managing People and Organizations. 11????? Edition. Canada: South-Western Cengage Learning.

Giddens, A. (2004). The Constitution of Society-Teori Strukturasi untuk Analisis Sosial. Pasuruan: Pedati.

Giddens, A. (2003). The Constitution of Society: Teori Strukturasi untuk Ananlisis Sosial. Pasuruan: Pedati.

Handoko, W. (2023). Looking at the Local Participation of Coastal Communities in South Java, Indonesia. International Journal of Environmental, Sustainability, and Social Science, 4(5), 1321–1333. https://doi.org/10.38142/ijesss.v4i5.760

Irwan, I., Ridha, N. R., Katili, D. I., & Mar’atuljannah, U. N. A. (2023). Risk Factor Analysis of Occupational Diseases in Computer Users. International Journal of Environmental, Sustainability, and Social Science, 4(5), 1295-1301. https://doi.org/10.38142/ijesss.v4i5.611

Littlejohn, S. W., & Karen, A. F. (2009). Teori Komunikasi, edisi 9. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.

M. Sastrapratedja. (2002). Etika dan Hukum. Kanisius, Yogyakarta.

Neuman, W. L. (2013). Metodologi Penelitian Sosial Pendekatan Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif Edisi 7. Jakarta: Indeks.

Nugroho, E., Ritonga, R., & Jamalullail, J. (2023). Administration of Fear Through Symbols about COVID-19 in Indonesian Online News. International Journal of Environmental, Sustainability, and Social Science, 4(5), 1519-1528. https://doi.org/10.38142/ijesss.v4i5.858

Priyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Surabaya: Zifatama Publishing.

Ruliana, P., & Puji, L. (2019). Teori Komunikasi. Depok: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Rubin, A., & Babbie, E. R. (2011). Research Methods for Social Work. Belmont: Thomson Learning.

Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sugiyono, P. L. (2021). “Metode Penelitian Komunikasi”. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Utari, P. (2011). Media Sosial, New Media dan Gender dalam Pusaran Teori Komunikasi. Bab Buku Komunikasi 2.0: Teoritisasi dan Implikasi. Yogyakarta: Aspikom.

Yin, R. K. (2012). Study Kasus Desain dan Metode. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.