Teachers' Perceptions of the Group Investigation (GI) Model for Improving Learning Outcomes and Academic Achievement in Science Instruction

Authors

  • Gede Yohanes Arygunartha Universitas Warmadewa
  • Victorious A Hamel Universitas Warmadewa
  • I Dewa Ayu Eka Pertiwi Universitas Warmadewa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38142/ijesss.v7i4.2029

Keywords:

Group Investigation (GI) Model, Learning Achievement, Learning Outcomes

Abstract

This study aims to enhance learning outcomes and achievement in technology—specifically by helping students understand science and technology concepts and their real-life applications—and to foster critical thinking skills, enabling students to think critically and analytically when solving problems related to science and technology. Learning outcomes refer to changes in behavior or capabilities that occur in students following the learning process; these outcomes may manifest as acquired knowledge, attitudes, or skills. The subjects of this study are teachers at SD Negeri 3 Buduk, an educational institution implementing the *Merdeka Belajar* (Freedom to Learn) curriculum. Preliminary observations involved gathering data on student learning outcomes and achievement through interviews, observations, and documentation. The issues faced by the partner teachers included a lack of understanding regarding the Group Investigation (GI) model and concerns stemming from previous instruction on the GI model. The implementation utilized a Group Investigation (GI) approach incorporating both quantitative and qualitative methods; this involved engaging the group, selecting the venue, and designating the selected individuals as training participants. The intervention was systematically planned, with students receiving instructional materials—prepared by the team in the form of a module—covering the fundamental concepts of the Group Investigation (GI) model to improve learning outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baharuddin, H., & Wahyuni, E. N. (2008). Teori belajar dan pembelajaran. Jogjakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.

Baser, M. (2006c). Promoting conceptual change through active learning using open software for physics simulation. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(3): 336-354. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1290

Cakir, M. (2008). Constructivist approaches to learning in science and their implications for science pedagogy: A literature review. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 3(4), 193-206. Terdapat pada http://www.ijese.com/ Diakses tanggal 3 September 2010.

Depdiknas. (2003). Pendekatan kontekstual (Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL)). Dirjen Pendidikan Lanjutan Pertama

Depdiknas. (2006). Permen no 23 tahun 2006 tentang standar kompetensi lulusan untuk satuan pendidikan dasar dan menengah. Dirjen Pendidikan Lanjutan Pertama.

Dilber, R. & Duzgun, B. (2008). Effectiveness of analogy on students’ success and elimination of misconceptions. Latin American Journal of Physics Education, 2(3), pp. 174–183. Terdapat pada http://www.journal.lapen.org.mx. Diakses tanggal 3 September 2010.

Hewson, P. W. (1992). Conceptual change in science teaching and teacher education. Paper. Presented at a meeting on “research and curriculum development in science teaching” Ministry for Education and Science. Madrid, Spain, June 1992.

Jauhar, M. (2011). Implementasi PAIKEM dari behavioristik sampai konstruktivistik pengembangan pembelajaran berbasis CTL (Contextual Teaching and Learning). Buku Ajar. Jakarta: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Johnson, E. B. (2011). CTL (Contextual Teaching and Learning). Buku Ajar. Jakarta: Perpustakaan Nasional.

Muliarta, I P. (2011). Implementasi model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing untuk meningkatkan kinerja ilmiah dan penguasaan konsep IPA (IPA) siswa kelas VIII B SMPN 5 Singaraja tahun pelajaran 2010/2011. Skripsi (tidak diterbitkan). Jurusan Pendidikan IPA, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu

Mulyasa. (2006). Kurikulum tingkat satuan pendidikan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Suastra, I W. (2009). Pembelajaran sains terkini: Mendekatkan siswa dengan lingkungan alamiah dan sosial budaya. Singaraja: Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha.

Sugiyono. (2008). Metode penelitian pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sukardi. (2003). Metodologi penelitian pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Suparno, P. (1997). Filsafat konstruktivisme dalam pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Kanisius

Downloads

Published

2026-07-10

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.