The Role of Accountants in Carbon Accounting to Support Energy Resilience Amid Global Geopolitical Dynamics

Authors

  • Sylvia Marcellina Universitas Esa Unggul, Indonesia
  • Budi Mulia Kurniawan Universitas Esa Unggul, Indonesia
  • Ameliya Silaning Utami Universitas Esa Unggul, Indonesia
  • Novia Rosita Universitas Esa Unggul, Indonesia
  • Yanuar Ramadhan Universitas Esa Unggul, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38142/ijesss.v7i4.2004

Keywords:

carbon accounting, geopolitics, system integration, energy security, role of accountants

Abstract

This study examines the role of accountants in leveraging carbon accounting as a strategic instrument to support energy security amidst global geopolitical dynamics. A qualitative descriptive approach was employed through a systematic literature review guided by the PRISMA framework, with data collected from various international academic databases covering publications from 2021 to 2026. Articles were selected based on relevance, indexing quality, and methodological clarity. The findings indicate that carbon accounting has evolved from a compliance-oriented reporting tool to a strategic information system that supports environmental transparency, energy efficiency, and managerial decision-making. Accountants are shown to play an increasingly central role in transforming carbon data into actionable strategic insights, particularly in managing energy risks generated by geopolitical tensions. However, implementation in Indonesia remains constrained by limited integration between accounting and energy management systems, a weak regulatory framework, and inadequate sustainability competencies among accounting professionals. The study concludes that integrating carbon accounting with the strategic role of accountants is crucial for strengthening corporate energy security, and recommends further empirical research in high-emission and energy-intensive sectors to validate the proposed integrative framework.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdulrahman, A., & Bukair, A. A. (2013). The influences of the Sharia Supervisory Board on corporate social responsibility disclosure by Islamic banks of the Gulf Cooperation Council countries. Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, 6(2), 65–104.

Adams, C. A., & Evans, R. (2004). Accountability, completeness, credibility, and the audit expectations gap. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 14, 97–115.

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108

Deegan, C. (2014). Financial Accounting Theory (4th ed.). McGraw -Hill Education.

De Villiers, C., Salvatore, F., & Molinari, M. (2025). Accounting for renewable energy: Investigating emerging topics and research pathways. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(4), 4597–4621. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4210

Dharma, F., Marimutu, M., & Alvia, L. (2024). Profitability and market value effect on carbon emission Disclosures: The moderating role of environmental performance. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 14(3), 463–472. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.15915

Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. The Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/1388226

Flouros, F., Pistikou, V., & Plakandaras, V. (2022). Geopolitical risk as a determinant of renewable energy investments. Energies, 15(4), 1498. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15041498

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman.

Freeman, R. E., & Reed, D. L. (1983). Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance. California Management Review, 25(3), 88–106.

Gray, R., Owen, D., & Adams, C. (1996). Accounting & Accountability: Changes and Corporate Challenges Social and Environmental Reporting. Prentice Hall.

Jasiūnas, J., Lund, P. D., & Mikkola, J. (2021). Energy systems resilience: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 150, 111476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111476

Kang, S., Peng, B., & Wang, Y. (2025). Research progress, hot spot evolution, and future directions of energy system resilience: A bibliometric overview. Energy Reports, 14, 3451–3467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2025.10.035

Kaur, R., Rana, K. P. S., Kumar, V., & Sharma, S. (2024). The concept of carbon accounting in manufacturing systems and supply chains. Energies, 17(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17010010

Kiswanto, K., Hajawiyah, A., Harjanto, AP, & Setyarini, ET (2023). Twelve years of research journey of carbon accounting. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 13(4), 246–254. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.14288

Oktaviani, A., Shaddiq, S., & Rosari, N. (2026). Do carbon exchanges make a difference to carbon disclosure and performance? Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 19(2), 120. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm19020120

Page, MJ, McKenzie, JE, Bossuyt, P.M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, TC, Mulrow, C.D., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guidelines for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Puspita, ME, Ratmono, D., Tantri, M., Julianto, Y., & Ridhasyah, R. (2024). Carbon emissions accounting Disclosure: An empirical analysis during the COVID-19 pandemic period in a developing country. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 14(2), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.15377

Sudarmaji, E., Yatim, MR, Harsono, H., Masrio, H., & Azizah, W. (2024). Quantifying drivers of GHG emissions in ASEAN: Modeling CO2 emissions using LMDI and ARIMAX approaches. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 14(6), 426–435. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.17186

Syam, MA, Malik, AD, & Ramlah, S. (2024). Carbon accounting: Its implications on accounting practices and corporate sustainability reports. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 14(5), 1–10.

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z

Downloads

Published

2026-07-06

Similar Articles

<< < 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.