Stakeholder Perceptions of the Procurement of Goods and Services at the Nusa Tenggara River Region II Office in 2020
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38142/jogta.v1i3.474Keywords:
Perceptions, Stakeholders, Goods and ServicesAbstract
This research is a descriptive research with a qualitative approach which was carried out at the Nusa Tenggara River Regional Office II with a total of 25 informants while the types of data in this study were primary data and secondary data which were collected through interview techniques, observation and document tracing. The results of the research based on the grid model from Bryson (2004) found that stakeholder perceptions of the procurement of goods and services at the 2020 Nusa Tenggara River Basin Hall II in terms of; (a) High Interest - Low Power (Subjects) have a bad perception of the procurement of goods and services at the 2020 Nusa Tenggara River Basin Center, while (b) the perception of High Interest - High Power (Players) is that there is a close relationship with project partners that has an impact on the quality and quality of work in the field (c) Low Interest - High Power (Context Setters) have the perception that some PPKs are indicated to be KKN, (d) Low Interest - Low Power (Crowd) have the perception that the project resulting from the procurement of goods and services has quality which is low and (e) Stakeholder perceptions of Aspects that Obstacle the Procurement of Goods and Services at the Nusa Tenggara River Region II Office in 2020 are; (a) the COVID-19 pandemic by making budget adjustments and refocusing, (b) the electronic system still has many weaknesses and (c) bureaucratic governance that needs to be improved.
References
Basrie, Himsiah. 2017. Analisis Pelaksanaan Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Secara Elektronik (E-Procurement) Pada Pemerintah Kota Bengkulu Tahun 2015. Tesis Universitas Bengkulu. http://repository.unib.ac.id/15722/
Bryson, J. 1995. Strategic Planning For Public And Non-Profit Organization (Rev. Ed). San Francisco: JosseyBass Publishers.
Bryson, J. M. 2004. What To Do When Stakeholders Matter: Stakeholder Identificatixon And Analysis Techniques. Public Management Review, 6(1), 21–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/1471903041 0001675722
Daake, D., & Anthony, WP. 2000. Understanding Stakeholders Power And Influence Gaps In A Health Care Organization: An Empirical Study. Health Care Management Review, 25 (3), 94-107.
Dwiwanty, G. 2018. Efektivitas Sistem E-Procurementdalam Pelelangan Umum Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pada Dinas Pekerjaan Umum Dan Penataan Ruang Provinsi Riau. Skripsi, Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim, Riau
Freeman, RE 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholders Approach. Massachusetts: Pitman.
Fletcher A, et. al. 2003. Mapping Stakeholder Perceptions For A Third Sector Organization. Melalui https://www.researchgate.net/publica tion/244006049_Mapping_stakeholder_perceptions_for_a_third_sector_organization.
Gonsalves, J., Becker, T., Braun, A., Campilan, D., & Chavez, H. 2005. Participatory Research and Development for Sustainable Agriculture and Natural Resources Management: A Sourcebook. Ottawa: CIP-UPWARD/IDRC.
Hardy, C. 1996. Understanding Power: Bringing About Strategic Change. British Journal of Management, 7 (special issue), S3S16.
Harmoni, A. 2013. Stakeholder-Based Analysis of Sustainability Report: A Case Study on Mining Companies in Indonesia. International Conference on Eurasian Economies 2013, 40, 204–210. https://doi.org/10.36880/c04.00704
Hitt, Michael A., R. Duane Ireland dan Robert E. Hoskisson. 1997. Manajemen Strategis: Menyongsong Era Persaingan Bebas dan Globalisasi. Terjemahan Armand Hediyanto. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Hörisch, J, Freeman, R. E. & Schaltegger, S. 2014. Applying Stakeholder Theory in Sustainability Management: Links, Similarities, Dissimilarities, and a Conceptual Framework. Organization and Environment, 27(4), 328–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026614535786
Jones, TM, & Wicks, AC. 1999. Convergent Stakeholders Theory. Academy of Management Review, 24 (2), 206-221.
Miles, M. B, Huberman, A.M, dan Saldana, J. 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis, A Methods Sourcebook, Edition 3. USA: Sage Publications. Terjemahan Tjetjep Rohindi Rohidi. Jakarta: UI-Press.
Mitchell, R K and Wood, D J. 2017. Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience?: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. https://www.jstor.org/stable/259247?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Mudjisantosa. 2014. Catatan Aspek Hukum Pengadaan dan Kerugian Negara. Yogyakarta: Prima Print.
Mulyono, P. E. 2020. Analisis Pelaksanaan Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Secara Elektronik pada Pemerintah Kabupaten Gresik. Airlangga Development Journal, 1(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.20473/adj.v1i1.18010
Osborne, David dan Ted Gaebler. 1993. Reinventing Government, How The. Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming The Public Sector. USA: A Plume.
Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. 1978. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
Schmeer K. 2000. Stakeholder Analysis Guidelines. Melalui: https://www.who.int/workforcealliance/knowledge/toolkit/33.pdf
Suherman, A.M. 2010. Hukum Pengadaan Barang (Government Procurement) Dan Pembangunan Ekonomi. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, Vol 40, No 3.
Triton, 2008, Marketing Strategic: Meningkatkan Pangsa Pasar dan Daya Saing, Yogyakarta: Tugu
Varvasovszky Z, Brugha R. 2000. How To Do (Or Not Do): A Stakeholder Analysis. Melalui https://wzr.ug.edu.pl/annawojewnikfilipkowska/upload/files/CITY_2000%20Brugha_Stakeholder%20analysis_how%20to%20do.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Siki Y. A. ASBANU, Petrus D E ROZARI, Ajis Salim Adang DJAHA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
