The Effect of Maturity of Government Internal Control System and Capabilities of Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus on the Government Performance Accountability System

Authors

  • Sri Puspita WULANDARI Tadulako University, Indonesia
  • Muhammad DIN Tadulako University, Indonesia
  • Masruddin MASRUDDIN Tadulako University, Indonesia
  • Rahma MASDAR Tadulako University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38142/jogta.v3i2.1243

Keywords:

Maturity of SPIP, Capabilities of APIP, SAKIP

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effect of the maturity of the Government Internal Control System (SPIP) and the capabilities of the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP) on the effectiveness of the Government Performance Accountability System (SAKIP). SPIP, as an internal control framework, functions to ensure that the management of state resources is carried out efficiently, effectively, and in accordance with applicable regulations. On the other hand, APIP, as a supervisory apparatus, plays an important role in ensuring that the implementation of government policies and programs runs in accordance with the objectives that have been set, as well as detecting and preventing deviations. This research uses secondary data from Regional Governments in Indonesia from 2018-2023, with a final sample size of 2,046 observations. The results show that the maturity of the government internal control system (SPIP) and the capability of the government internal supervisory apparatus (APIP) have a positive and significant impact on the government performance accountability system. This study suggests the need to strengthen SPIP and improve the capabilities of APIP to ensure better accountability in the government system, which will ultimately contribute to the improvement of public service quality.

References

Abdullah, & Muliati, S. (2023). The meta-analysis study: Career decision-making self-efficacy and career maturity. Insight: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 25(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.26486/psikologi.v25i1.3254

Agatha, C. K. (2018). Analisis Sistem Informasi Akuntansi Atas Penggajian Dan Pengupahan Pada Pt . Batik Arjuna Cemerlang Sukoharjo. Advance, 5(2), 7–19.

Bendickson, J., Muldoon, J., Liguori, E., & Davis, P. E. (2016). Agency theory: the times, they are a-changin’. Management Decision, 54(1), 174–193. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-02-2015-0058

Crocetta, C., Antonucci, L., Cataldo, R., Galasso, R., Grassia, M. G., Lauro, C. N., & Marino, M. (2021). Higher-Order PLS-PM Approach for Different Types of Constructs. Social Indicators Research, 154(2), 725–754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02563-w

Darmawan, D., Yazid, H., & Bastian, E. (2022). Peran Karakteristik Aparat Pengawas Internal Pemerintah Terhadap Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah Dengan Komitmen Sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi. Jurnal Kebijakan Pembangunan Daerah, 6(2), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.56945/jkpd.v6i2.191

Diansari, R. E., Musah, A. A., & Binti Othman, J. (2023). Factors affecting village fund management accountability in Indonesia: The moderating role of prosocial behavior. Cogent Business and Management, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2219424

Din, M., Pakawaru, I. M., Faizal, A., Mappanyukki, A., Usman, R., & Buntulabi, D. R. (2023). Peningkatan Akuntabilitas Desa Melalui Pendampingan Penyusunan Laporan Keuangan Desa Tamarenja. Sriwijaya Accounting Community Services (SACS), 3(1), 1–8.

E. Malelea, F., Chairil Furqan, A., . T., &. M. (2024). The Role of Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP) and Government Internal Control System (SPIP) in Achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in Indonesia. KnE Social Sciences, 2024, 379–398. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i20.16541

Ghasemy, M., Teeroovengadum, V., Becker, J. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2020). This fast car can move faster: a review of PLS-SEM application in higher education research. Higher Education, 80(6), 1121–1152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00534-1

Herawati, F. dan H. (2019). Jurnal Akuntansi Unihaz-JAZ Desember Jurnal Akuntansi Unihaz-JAZ Desember. Akuntansi Unihaz-JAZ, 1(17), 19–35.

Junedah, L. (2019). Pengaruh Maturitas SPIP, Kapabilitas APIP, serta Implementasi E-Planning Dan E-Budgeting terhadap Kualitas Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (SAKIP). http://digilib.unila.ac.id/id/eprint/57618

Misenti, N. C. (2018). Should an Agent Be Liable for Ordinary Negligence When Liability Is Transferred To the Principal? Southern Journal of Business and Ethics, 10, 131–153. https://search.proquest.com/docview/2228580812?accountid=14744%0Ahttps://cbua-us.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/openurl?institution=34CBUA_US&vid=34CBUA_US:VU1&lang=es?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&genre=article&sid=ProQ:

Murdi, H., & Putri, A. (2020). Faktor – Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Efektifitas Penerapan Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (Sakip) Kota Payakumbuh. Jurnal Ekonomi, 23(1), 50–66. https://doi.org/10.47896/je.v23i1.189

Osipova, E., & Ph, D. (2011). Establishing Cooperative Relationships and Joint Risk Management in Construction Projects : Agency Theory Perspective. Journal of Management in Engineering, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000346.

Pattawe, A., Haris, N., Natsir, M., . J., . M., Din, M., & Larija, A. G. (2022). Internal Control System between Fraud Asset Management and Local Governance: A Social and Organizational Perspective. Webology, 19(1), 5455–5465. https://doi.org/10.14704/web/v19i1/web19366

Peraturan Badan Pengawasan Keuangan Dan Pembangunan Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 2021, 1 (2021).

Peraturan BPK. (2008). Peraturan BPK. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/4876

Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 29 Tahun 2014 Tentang Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah, Republik Indonesia 1 (2014).

Prakoso, F. B., & Aryati, T. (2024). The Effect of Control System Maturity The Effect of Control System Maturity and the Government Internal Oversight Capability Level on Audit Opinions. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Kesatuan, 12(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.37641/jiakes.v12i1.2418

Rachmat, M., & Wijaya, C. (2024). Capability Development of Government Internal Control Apparatus in Improving the Effectiveness of Internal Control. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, 5(5), 2250–2258. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true%5C&profile=ehost%5C&scope=site%5C&authtype=crawler%5C&jrnl=27236609%5C&AN=177806084%5C&h=kyZ13KzQS0QWOQa1vYw8Oxrrh2p0GmR6UFq8eNeo5OpzVApvuA47g880O57P05ePX%2BkxC3N%2B82MYJHef%2BEBHFA%3D%3D%5C&crl=c

Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Cheah, J. H., Ting, H., Moisescu, O. I., & Radomir, L. (2020). Structural model robustness checks in PLS-SEM. Tourism Economics, 26(4), 531–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354816618823921

Simanjuntak, G. P., & W, L. S. (2022). Evaluation Of The Implementation Of The Internal Audit Capability Model ( IACM ) Level 3 In The Supervision System Of The Inspectorate General Of The Ministry Of Agriculture. International Journal of Science, Technology & Management, 295, 1581–1602.

Sutaryo, S., Sahari, S., Jakpar, S., & Balia, S. S. (2023). Internal audit function, political characteristics, and compliance with government accrual-based accounting standards in Indonesian local government. Contaduria y Administracion, 68(1), 25–57. https://doi.org/10.22201/fca.24488410e.2023.3357

Teguh Setiawan Wibowo, Taryana, T., Yayuk Suprihartini, Daniel Tulasi, Didik Supriyanto, & Amin Harahap. (2023). The Effect Of Accountability, Internal Control System, And Accounting Information Systems on The Performance Of The Organization In The Financial And Asset Management Agency. International Journal of Economic Research and Financial Accounting (IJERFA), 1(2), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.55227/ijerfa.v1i2.30

Yudanto, L. A., Adechandra, D., & Pesudo, A. (2020). Perception of civil servants' s on APIP capability as moderating variable on the relationship between the implementation of SPIP and SAKIP (study on Salatiga city government). 10(2), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.14414/tiar.v10i2.2140

Yudiyanto, Y., & Ningsih, S. (2023). The Role of Risk Management Implementation in Increasing Accountability: A Study of All Regency/Municipality Governments. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 19(2), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v19i2.1143

Yusup, M., & Rahadian, Y. (2023). Evaluation of Capability Improvement of Government Internal Control Apparatus. Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 8(1), 48–62. https://doi.org/10.23917/reaksi.v8i1.21241

Downloads

Published

2024-10-31