Restorative Justice Implementation In Bali Police Cybercrime Cases: Procedures, Barriers, And Digital Recovery

Bagus Muhamad Salim  Putera; Simon  Nahak; I Wayan  Rideng

doi:10.38142/pjlel.v4i2.1809

Authors

Bagus Muhamad Salim Putera Warmadewa University
Simon Nahak Warmadewa University, Indonesia
I Wayan Rideng Warmadewa University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38142/pjlel.v4i2.1809

Keywords:

Restorative Justice, Cybercrime, Digital Recovery Measures, Criminal

Abstract

This article examines how restorative justice is implemented in cybercrime cases handled by the Bali Regional Police's Cyber Directorate, with the dual aim of identifying operational barriers and formulating strengthening strategies. The analysis is anchored in concepts of criminal law and punishment, as well as the purposes of law—justice, legal certainty, and social utility—so that restorative outcomes can be assessed against principled thresholds rather than ad hoc compromise. The study employs a juridical-normative method complemented by empirical materials drawn from interviews, document analysis, and limited observation of case conferences and mediated settlements, alongside multi-year case data. The findings show uneven implementation that improves when case triage is disciplined and when a digital recovery toolkit—timely content removal, account restoration, verifiable restitution, public clarification, and guarantees of non-repetition—is applied. Key impediments include institutional formalism, technical features of cyber offending, the scarcity of specific operational guidelines, concerns about victims' rights and legal certainty, public misconceptions, and gaps in mediation and forensics capacity. The results suggest restorative justice should operate as a conditional instrument: prioritized where measurable recovery for victims is feasible and redirected to prosecution when public interest and deterrence predominate. Strengthened risk-based SOPs, targeted training, inclusive outreach, platform liaison, and victim-centered performance metrics are recommended to balance justice, certainty, and utility

References

Acosta-López, J. and Espitia Murcia, C.V. (2020) “Justicia restaurativa y reparación: desafíos de la JEP frente a una relación en construcción,” Vniversitas, 69, pp. 1–31. Available at: https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.vj69.jrrd.

Adawiah, A. (2024) “Enhancing Tourist Perceptions; A Cross-Comparison of Information and Management Platforms for Tourism Brand Development in Bali and Yogyakarta,” Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 18(7), p. e06918. Available at: https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n7-109.

Armstrong, J. (2010) "Restorative Justice as a Pathway for Forgiveness: How Could Forgiveness Operate within the Criminal Justice System?" in A Journey through Forgiveness. BRILL, pp. 179–190. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1163/9781848880481_020.

Choi, J.J., Bazemore, G. and Gilbert, M.J. (2012) “Review of research on victims’ experiences in restorative justice: Implications for youth justice,” Children and Youth Services Review, 34(1), pp. 35–42. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.08.011.

Garcia, V. (2020) “THE ENFORCEMENT OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE IN INDONESIAN CRIMINAL LAW,” Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 28(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v28i1.10680.

Goldblum, A. (2023). "Restorative Justice From Theory to Practice," in Reframing Campus Conflict. New York: Routledge, pp. 209–227. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003446736-12.

Holmes, J.D. (2011). Criminal Law. Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1201/b11684.

Judah, E.H. (2013). Criminal Justice. Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203046944.

Jülich, S. (2009) “11 Restorative Justice and Gendered Violence in New Zealand,” in Restorative Justice and Violence Against Women. Oxford University PressNew York, pp. 239–254. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195335484.003.0011.

Kirkwood, S. (2022). "A practice framework for restorative justice," Aggression and Violent Behavior, 63, p. 101688. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2021.101688.

Latha, S. and Thilagaraj, R. (2013) “Restorative Justice in India,” Asian Journal of Criminology, 8(4), pp. 309–319. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-013-9164-4.

McDowell, L.A., Braswell, M.C. and Edwards, B.D. (2022) “Restorative Justice and Ethics,” in Justice, Crime, and Ethics. New York: Routledge, pp. 250–278. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003342885-17.

Roberts, J. V. and Stalans, L.J. (2004) “Restorative Sentencing: Exploring the Views of the Public,” Social Justice Research, 17(3), pp. 315–334. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SORE.0000041296.99271.52.

Rochaeti, N., Prasetyo, M.H. and Park, J.H. (2023) "Implementing Restorative Justice to Build the Criminal Justice System in Indonesia: A Study of the Batak Toba Justice System," LAW REFORM, 19(2), pp. 221–247. Available at: https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v19i2.53184.

Sumartini Saraswati, N.W. et al. (2023) “The Image of Tourist Attraction in Bali Based on Big Data Analytics and Sentiment Analysis,” in 2023 International Conference on Smart-Green Technology in Electrical and Information Systems (ICSGTEIS). IEEE, pp. 82–87. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSGTEIS60500.2023.10424322.

Toews, B. (2023) "Prioritizing Accountability and Reparations: Restorative Justice Design and Infrastructure," in pp. 703–732. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11972-9_25.

Williams, D. (2024). "Restorative Practice: Background and Framework," in Restorative Justice and Practice in US Education. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, pp. 11–31. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-68412-8_2.