Unveiling the Green Impact: Exploring the Nexus Between Trade Openness and Environmental Quality in South Africa

Authors

  • Unathi DINGISWAYO Walter Sisulu University, South Africa
  • Kin SIBANDA Walter Sisulu University, South Africa
  • Dorah DUBIHLELA Walter Sisulu University, South Africa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38142/ijesss.v4i5.714

Keywords:

Trade openness, carbon emissions, Granger causality test, Autoregressive distributed lag bounds (ARDL), South Africa

Abstract

In light of the escalating concerns about environmental sustainability and the profound impact of international trade on environmental outcomes, the study's focal point was to empirically investigate the relationship between trade openness and environmental quality in South Africa from 1994 to 2018. In order to achieve the goal, the research utilized the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) Bounds method and Granger causality test for analyzing data. The ARDL Bounds approach was chosen for its ability to examine both short-run and long-run relationships, while the Granger causality test provided insights into the direction of causality between the variables. This combination of robust econometric techniques enhances the reliability and depth of the study's findings, leading to a more comprehensive understanding of the complex relationship between trade openness and environmental quality in the country. The analysis results revealed a significant and positive relationship between trade openness and carbon emissions in the short and long run. The Granger causality test also indicated a unidirectional causality from trade openness to environmental quality. These implications are paramount for the South African government's policy formulation. In order to tackle the environmental issues that come with open trade, the government must put in place trade agreements that will enhance its ability to address these concerns efficiently. One crucial step is reducing trade barriers on environmental goods, facilitating increased access to green technologies at lower costs. Moreover, the government should prioritize enacting and enforcing strict environmental laws to avoid the "pollution haven hypothesis," which often affects low-income countries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmed, Z., Asghar, M.M., Malik, M.N. & Nawaz, K. (2020). Moving Towards a Sustainable Environment: The Dynamic Linkage Between Natural Resources, Human Capital, Urbanization, Economic Growth, And Ecological Footprint in China. Resources Policy, 67, p.101677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101677

Aiyetan, I. R., & Olomola, P. A. (2017). Environmental degradation, energy consumption, population growth, and economic growth: Does Environmental Kuznets curve matter for Nigeria? Economic and Policy Review, 16(2).

Albiman, M.M., Suleiman, N.N. & Baka, H.O. (2015). The Relationship Between Energy Consumption, CO2 Emissions and Economic Growth in Tanzania. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 9(3), pp.361-375. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJESM-05-2014-0006

Antweiler, W., Copeland, B. R., & Taylor, M. S. (2001). Is Free Trade Good for the Environment? American economic review, 91(4), 877-908. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.4.877

Atsu, F., Adams, S., & Adjei, J. (2021). ICT, energy consumption, financial development, and environmental degradation in South Africa. Heliyon, 7(7). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07328

Beladi, H. & Oladi R. (2011). Does Trade Liberalization Increase Global Pollution? Resource Energy Econ 33(1):172–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2010.04.009

Boateng, F.K. (2020). Effects of Economic Growth, Trade Openness, and Urbanization on Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Ghana, 1960 to 2014. Vol. 7, No. 2. Redfame Publishing URL: http://aef.redfame.com [ Accessed 20 August 2022] https://doi.org/10.11114/aef.v7i2.4710

Bongaarts, J. (1992). Population Growth and Global Warming. Population and Development Review, pp.299–319. https://doi.org/10.2307/1973681

Breusch, T. S. (1978). "Testing for Autocorrelation in Dynamic Linear Models," Australian Economic Papers, 17, 334–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8454.1978.tb00635.x

Brooks, C. (2002). Introductory Econometrics for Finance. 2nd edition, Cambridge

Chen, G., Kim, K. A., Nofsinger, J. R., & Rui, O. M. (2007). Trading performance, disposition effect, overconfidence, representativeness bias, and experience of emerging market investors. Journal of behavioral decision making, 20(4), 425-451. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.561

Chen, X., & Huang, B. (2019). Environmental impacts of international trade: A review of the literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 220, 1225-1239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.101

Chontanawat, J. (2019). Driving Forces of Energy-Related CO2 Emissions Based on Expanded IPAT Decomposition Analysis: Evidence Rom ASEAN and Four Selected Countries. Energies, 12(4), p.764. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12040764

Copeland, B.R. & Taylor, M.S. (2013). Trade and the Environment. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-30531-1_15

Dinda, S. (2004). Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey. Ecological economics, 49(4), 431–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.02.011

Engle, R. F. (1982). Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society, pp. 987–1007. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912773

Frankel, J.A. & Rose, A.K. (2005). Is Trade Good or Bad for the Environment? Sorting Out the Causality. Review of economics and statistics, 87(1), pp.85-91. https://doi.org/10.1162/0034653053327577

Gill, F L, Viswanathan K, K, Mohd Zaini Abdul Karim MZA. (2018). The Critical Review of the Pollution Haven Hypothesis. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 2018, 8(1), 167-174. Available at http: www.econjournals.com [Accessed 25 August 2021]

Godfrey, L. (1978). "Testing Against General Autoregressive and Moving Average Error Models When the Regressors Include Lagged Dependent Variables," Econometrica, 46, 1293–1302. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913829

Gujarati, D. N. (2022). Basic econometrics. Prentice Hall.

Ibrahim, L.R and Ajide, K.B. (2022). Trade Facilitation and Environmental Quality: Empirical Evidence from Selected African Countries. Environment, development, and sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/510668-021-01497-8 [Accessed 03 November 2022]

Iheanacho, E. (2017). Empirical Review on the Relationship between Real Wages, Inflation and Labour Productivity in Nigeria. ARDL bounds testing approach. Issues in Economics and Business, 3(1), 9–29.

Iorember, P.T., Jelilov, G., Usman, O., Isik, A., Ceik, B. (2021). The Influence of Renewable Energy Use, Human Capital, and Trade on Environmental Quality in South Africa: Multiple Structural Breaks Cointegration Approach. Environmental Science and population research. https://doi.org/10.1007/11356-020-11370-2 [Accessed 03 November 2022]

Jaffe, A. B., Peterson, S. R., Portney, P. R., & Stavins, R. N. (1995). Environmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of US Manufacturing: What Does The Evidence Tell Us. Journal of Economic Literature, 33(1), 132–163.

Jarque, C. M., & Bera, A. K. (1980). Efficient tests for normality, homoscedasticity, and serial independence of regression residuals. Economics Letters, 6(3), 255-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(80)90024-5

Jarque, C. M., & Bera, A. K. (1987). A test for normality of observations and regression residuals. International Statistical Review/Revue Internationale de Statistique, 163-172. https://doi.org/10.2307/1403192

Khan, I., Lei, H., Shah, A.A., Khan, I., Baz, K., Koondhar, M.A. & Hatab, A.A. (2022). Environmental Quality and the Asymmetrical Nonlinear Consequences of Energy Consumption, Trade Openness, and Economic Development: Prospects for Environmental Management and Carbon Neutrality. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(10), 14654–14664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16612-5

Khan, I., Hou, F., Zakari, A., Tawan, V., Ali, S.A. (2021). Energy Use and Urbanization as Determinants of China's Environmental Quality: Prospects of the Paris Climate Agreement. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2021.1972797 [Accessed 02 November 2022]

Le, T.H., Chang, Y. and Park, D. (2016). Trade Openness and Environmental Quality: International Evidence. Energy policy, 92, pp.45–55. Available at www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol. [Accessed 20 August 2022] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.01.030

Lu, R., Zhao, X., Li, J., Niu, P., Yang, B., Wu, H., Wang, W., Song, H., Huang, B., Zhu, N. and Bi, Y. (2020). Genomic Characterisation and Epidemiology of 2019 Novel Coronavirus: Implications for Virus Origins and Receptor Binding. The Lancet, 395(10224), pp.565-574. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30251-8

Managi, S., Hibiki, A. & Tsurumi, T. (2009). Does Trade Openness Improve Environmental Quality? Journal of environmental economics and Management, 58(3), pp.346-363. Available at www.elsevier.com/locate/jeem [Accessed 05 September 2022]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2009.04.008

Mukhtarov, S., Shahbaz, M., & Ur Rehman, I. (2020). The Dynamics of Electricity Consumption, Economic Growth, and Trade Openness in Kazakhstan: Evidence from ARDL bounds test. Energy Reports, p. 6, 1197–1204.

Mukhtarov, S., Humbatova, S., Seyfullayev, I. & Kalbiyev, Y. (2020). The Effect of Financial Development on Energy Consumption in the Case of Kazakhstan. Journal of Applied Economics, 23(1), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/15140326.2019.1709690

Ohlan, R. (2015). The impact of Population Density, Energy Consumption, Economic Growth, and Trade Openness on CO2 Emissions in India. Natural Hazards, 79(2), 1409–1428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1898-0

Omri, A., (2013). CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and economic growth nexus in MENA countries: evidence from simultaneous equations models. Journal of Energy Economics (Elsevier); 40:657-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.09.003

Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Level Relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289-326. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.616

Sasana, H. and Putri, A.E. (2018). The Increase in Energy Consumption and Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions in Indonesia. In E3S web of conferences (Vol. 31, p. 01008). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20183101008

Shahbaz M, Nasreen S, Ahmed K, Hammoudeh S. (2017). Trade Openness–Carbon Emissions Nexus: The Importance of Turning Points of Trade Openness for Country Panels. Energy Econ 61:221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.11.008

Shi, A. (2001). The Impact of Population Pressure on Global Carbon Dioxide Emissions, 1975–1996: Evidence from Pooled Cross-Country Data. Ecological economics, 44(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00223-9

Soylu, Ö.B., Adebayo, T.S. and Kirikkaleli, D. (2021). The Imperativeness of Environmental Quality in China Amidst Renewable Energy Consumption and Trade Openness. Sustainability, 13(9), p.5054. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095054

Tobey, J. A. (1990). Effects of Domestic Environmental Policy on Patterns of International Trade (No. 953-2016-74788).

Toloui, M. (2018). Frost Heave as the Main Process Defining Natural Unforested Areas Below a Temperature Treeline (Master's thesis, Graduate Studies).

Toloui, R. (2018). Global Financial Crisis: Origin and Causes – Lecturers Series Navigating Financial Crisis in the Modern Global Economy. Stanford University. Available online: https://explorecourses.stanford.edu/search;jsessionid=1y2is9l9lfuow1fbcw15q7t0a2? q=ECON14&academicYear=20192020 (accessed on 21 November 2022).

Tong, T., Ortiz, J., Xu, C., & Li, F. (2020). Economic growth, energy consumption, and carbon dioxide emissions in the E7 countries: a bootstrap ARDL bound test. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 10(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-020-00253-6

Udeagha, M.C., Ngepah, N., 2022. Does trade openness mitigate the environmental degradation in South Africa? Environmental Science and Pollution Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17193-z

Van Tran, N., (2020). The environmental effects of trade openness in developing countries: conflict or cooperation? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(16), pp.19783–19797. Available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08352 [Accessed 24 August 2022]

Vidyarthi, H. (2013). Energy Consumption, Carbon Emissions and Economic Growth in India. World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.1108/WJSTSD-07-2013-0024

Vilas-Ghiso, S., & Liverman, D. (2006). Scale, Technique and Composition Effects in the Mexican Agricultural Sector: The Influence of NAFTA and the Institutional Environment. Third North American Symposium on Assessing the Environmental Effects of Trade. Montreal, 5, 1-39.

Wang, Q., & Zhang, F. (2020). Does increasing investment in research and development promote economic growth decoupling from carbon emission growth? An empirical analysis of BRICS countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, p. 252, 119853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119853

World Bank. (2020). South Africa. Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/country/south-africa

World Bank. (2021). World development indicators. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators. Accessed 01 June 2022

Zhao, P., Zeng, L., Li, P., Lu, H., Hu, H., Li, C., ... & Qi, Y. (2022). China's transportation sector's carbon dioxide emissions efficiency and influencing factors are based on the EBM DEA model with undesirable outputs and the spatial Durbin model. Energy, 238, 121934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121934

Downloads

Published

2023-09-30