Factors Influencing Adoption of Sustainable Supply Chain Management Practices Among Manufacturing Firms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38142/ijesss.v4i3.416Keywords:
Sustainable Supply Chain Management, Moral Factors, Instrumental Factor, Knowledge FactorsAbstract
There is a significant gap in emerging nations such as Ghana on factors influencing the adoption of Sustainable Supply Chain Management (SSCM), as most of these studies are conducted in advanced nations. As a result, this study investigates the factors influencing manufacturing companies in Ghana's adoption of SSCM practices. Three hundred and three 303 manufacturing firms with an annual turnover of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) were purposively selected for the study. Throughout the study, close-ended questionnaires were adopted for the data collection. Structural equation model (SEM) was used to examine empirically the factors that influence the firms’ adoption of SSCM. The study revealed that adoption of SSCM is influenced by instrumental, moral, and knowledge factors. Based on the study outcomes presented and discussed, the study concluded that instrumental, relational, moral and knowledge factors affected the adoption of SSCM practices by firms in Ghana
Further studies on the subject can adopt a case study approach, as this method will be able to investigate the topic in a manner that allows for a more in-depth comprehension of the subject in a particular context.
Downloads
References
Adarkwah, F., Ahudey, E. and Santuoh, F. J. (2018). Finance Challenges of Manufacturing Companies in Ghana and Their Contributions to the Economic Growth of Ghana. European Journal of Business and Management, 10(10).
Ahi, P. & Searcy, C. (2013). A comparative literature analysis of definitions for green and sustainable supply chain management, Journal of Cleaner Production, 52(1), 329–341. Accessed on 3 March 2020 from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.018.
Al-Odeh, M. & Smallwood, J. (2012). Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Literature Review, Trends, and Framework. International Journal of Computational Engineering and Management, 15(1).
Awaysheh, A. and Klassen. R. D. (2010). “The Impact of Supply Chain Structure on the Use of Supplier Socially Responsible Practices.” International Journal of Operations and Production Management 30 (12): 1246–1268.
Bals, L., Schulze, H., Kelly, S. and Stek, K. (2019). Purchasing and supply management (PSM) competencies: Current and future requirements. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 25, 100572.
Bendul, J.C., Rosca, E., & Pivovarova, D. (2016). Sustainable supply chain models for base of the pyramid. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, S107-S120
Borel-Saladin, J. M., & Turok, I. N. (2013). The impact of the green economy on jobs in South Africa: news and views. South African Journal of Science, 109(9), 104
Bowen, F. E., Cousins, P. D., Lamming, R. C. & Faruk, A. C. (2001). "Horse for courses: explaining the gap between the theory and practice of green supply", Greener Management International, 9(3), 41–60.
Bryman, A. & Bell, E. (2007). Business Research Methods, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
Busby, J. S. (2019). The co-evolution of competition and parasitism in the resource-based view: a risk model of product counterfeiting. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 276 (1), 300-313
Büyüközkan, G., & Göçer, F. (2018). Digital supply chain: Literature review and a proposed framework for future research. Computers in Industry, 97, 157-177
Carter, C. R. & Rogers, D. S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 38, 360–387.
Colicchia, C., Melacini, M. and Perotti, S. (2011). Benchmarking supply chain sustainability: insights from a field study. Benchmarking: an international journal.
de Camargo Fiorini, P., Seles, B.M.R.P., Jabbour, C.J.C, Mariano, E.B, & deSousa Jabbour, A.B.L. (2018). Management theory and bid data literature: From a review to a research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 112-129
Donaldson, L. (2001). The contingency theory of organizations. London: SAGE.
Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Papadopoulos, T., Childe, S. J., Shibin, K. T. & Wamba, S.F. (2017). Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Framework and Further Research Directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, p. 142, 1119–1130.
Elkington, J. (1998). Partnerships from cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Environ. Qual. Manage. 8(1), 37–51.
Gold, S., Hahn, R. and Seuring, S. (2013). Sustainable supply chain management in “Base of the Pyramid” food projects—A path to triple bottom line approaches for multinationals?. International Business Review, 22(5), 784-799.
Gold, S., Seuring, S. and Beske, P. (2010). Sustainable supply chain management and inter-organizational resources: A literature review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(4), 230–245
Gunasekaran, A., Patel, C. & McGaughey, R. E. (2004). A framework for supply chain performance measurement, International Journal of Production Economics, 87, 333-347
Hsu, C.C, Tan, K.C., Zailani, S.H.M. and Jayaraman, V. (2012). "Supply chain drivers that foster the development of green initiatives in an emerging economy", International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 33 Iss: 6, 656 – 688Hsu et al., 2016
Jensen, J. A., Cobbs, J.B. and Turner, B.A. (2016). Evaluating sponsorship through the lens of the resource-based view: the potential for sustained competitive advantage. Bus. Horiz. 59 (2), 163-173.
Khan, M., Hussain, M., Gunasekaran, A., Ajmal, M. M., and Helo, P. T. (2018). Motivators of social sustainability in healthcare supply chains in the UAE—Stakeholder perspective. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 14, 95-104.
Khokhar, M., Zia, S., Islam, T., Sharma, A., Iqbal, W., and Irshad, M. (2022). Going green supply chain management during covid-19, assessing the best supplier selection criteria: A triple bottom line (tbl) approach. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 36-51.
Kleindorfer, P.R., Singhal, K., & Van Wassenhove, L.N. (2005). Sustainable operations management. Production and operations management, 14(4), 482-492
Kozlowski, A., Searcy, C., & Bardecki, M. (2015). Corporate sustainability reporting in the apparel industry: An analysis of indicators disclose. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management.
Kshetri, N. (2018). 1 blockchain's roles in meeting Krejcie, R. V., and Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and psychological measurement, 30(3), 607–610.
Laosirihongthong, T., Samaranayake, P., Nagalingam, S. V., and Adebanjo, D. (2020). Prioritization of sustainable supply chain practices with triple bottom line and organizational theories: industry and academic perspectives. Production Planning and Control, 31(14), 1207-1221.
Liu, W. and Atuahene-Gima, K. (2018). Enhancing product innovation performance in a dysfunctional competitive environment: the roles of competitive strategies and market-based assets. Ind. Mark. Manag. 73, 7-20
Maama, H., Doorasamy, M. & Rajaram, J. (2021). Materiality of Environmental and Social Sustainability Reporting: Insights from Minority Stakeholders. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2021.2006074
Markley, M.J., Davis L. (2007). Exploring Future Competitive Advantage through Sustainable Supply Chains, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 37:763-774. [Accessed on 7 March, 2021]
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D.S. (2011). Creating and capturing value: strategic corporate social responsibility, resource-based theory, and sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1480-1495
Nti, K. (2015). Diagnostic Study of Light Manufacturing in Ghana. African Center for Economic Transformation
Progoulaki, M. and Roe, M. (2011). Dealing with multicultural human resources in a socially responsible manner: a focus on the maritime industry. WMU J. Marit. Aff. 10 (1), 7-23
Schinas, O., Ross, H. H. and Rossol, T. D. (2018). Financing green ships through export credit schemes. Transp. Res. D Transp. Environ. 65, 300-311.
Seuring, S. and Muller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. J. Clean. Prod. 16, 1699-1710
Seuring, S., Sarkis, J., Müller, M., and Rao, P. (2008). “Sustainability and supply chain management – An introduction to the special issue”. In: Journal of Cleaner Production 16, pp. 1545–1551.
Sunderland, P. L. and Denny, R. M. (2016). Doing Anthropology in Consumer Research. Routledge
Tate, W. L., Ellram, L. M., and Kirchoff, J. F. (2010). "Corporate social responsibility reports: a thematic analysis related to supply chain management", Journal of supply chain management, 46(1), pp. 19-44
Vasileiou, K., and Morris, J. (2006). The sustainability of the supply chain for fresh potatoes in Britain. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180
Yuen, K. F. & Thai, V. (2017). Barriers to supply chain integration in the maritime logistics industry. Marit. Econ. Logist. 19 (3), 551–572.
Yuen, K. F. Thai, V.V. & Wong, Y. D. (2016a). Are customers willing to pay for corporate social responsibility? A study of individual-specific mediators. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 27 (7e8), 912–926.
Yuen, K. F., Thai, V. V., Wong, Y. D. (2017a). Corporate social responsibility and classical competitive strategies of maritime transport firms: a contingency-fit perspective. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 98, 1–13.
Yuen, K. F., Wang, X., Ma, F., Lee, G. & Li, X. (2019a). Critical success factors of supply chain integration in container shipping: an application of resource-based view theory. Marit. Policy Manag. 1-16.
Yuen, K. F., Wang, X., Wong, Y. D. and Ma, F. (2019b). A contingency view of the effects of sustainable shipping exploitation and exploration on business performance. Transp. Policy 77, 90-103.
Yuen, K. F., Wang, X., Wong, Y. D. & Zhou, Q. (2017b). Antecedents and outcomes of sustainable shipping practices: the integration of stakeholder and behavioural theories. Transp. Res. E Logist. Transp. Rev. 108, 18-35
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Johnson NSOWAH, Maxwell Agabu PHIRI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.