Enterprise Risk Management, Value Chain, And Life Cycle Cost: How The Three Concepts Are Adopted To Increase Competitiveness.

Antonius ALIJOYO

doi:10.38142/ijesss.v3i2.228

Authors

Antonius ALIJOYO Parahyangan Catholic University, Indonesia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38142/ijesss.v3i2.228

Keywords:

company competitiveness, enterprise risk management, life cycle cost, value chain

Abstract

Enterprise Risk Management (ERM), Value Chain VC), and Life Cycle Cost (LCC) are three crucial concepts in running an effective company. Hence, no specific study has been done to identify how those concepts were implemented in companies in Indonesia. Thus, the study objective was to identify types of ERM used by the companies, how they connect the ERM to VC and LCC, and how effective the combination of the three concepts to enhance companies’ competitiveness was. The study data were collected through focus groups discussion and interviews. This study involved some scholars and selected professionals who were the senior management of corporations listed in IDX. The FGD and interview results were analyzed qualitatively through an interactive data analysis model. The study found that most companies applied the ISO 31000 as their ERM. The respondents agreed that ERM was used as the basis for setting and managing prices that support the implementation of VC and LCC. Besides, they also believed that the integration of the concepts was effective in increasing competitiveness. Since this study was conducted qualitatively, the result of the study needs to be supported by a further study using a quantitative approach to strengthen the result of the study so that it can be generalized to a bigger population.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad, R. A. R., Abdullah, N., Jamel, N. E. S. M., & Omar, N. (2015). Board Characteristics and Risk Management and Internal Control Disclosure Level: Evidence from Malaysia. Procedia Economics and Finance, 31, 601-610. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01147-8

Ahmad, S., Ng, C., & McManus, L. A. (2014). Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Implementation: Some Empirical Evidence from Large Australian Companies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 164, 541-547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.144

Alijoyo, A. (2020). Enterprise Risk Management. Center for Risk Management and Sustainability Indonesia.

Arena, M., Arnaboldi, M., & Azzone, G. (2011). Is enterprise risk management real? Journal of Risk Research, 14(7), 779-797. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2011.571775

Bauner, C., & Wang, E. (2019). The effect of competition on pricing and product positioning: Evidence from wholesale club entry. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 67, 102525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2019.102525

Borek, A., Parlikad, A. K., Webb, J., & Woodall, P. (2014). Integrating the TIRM Process within the Organization (A. Borek, A. K. Parlikad, J. Webb, & P. B. T.-T. I. R. M. Woodall (eds.); pp. 157-166). Morgan Kaufmann. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-405547-6.00009-2

Brennan, L., & Rakhmatullin, R. (2017). Transnationalizing Smart Specialization Strategy. In S. Radosevic, A. Curaj, R. Gheorghiu, L. Andreescu, & I. B. T.-A. in the T. and P. of S. S. Wade (Eds.), Specialization (pp. 249-268). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804137-6.00011-5

Cao, L., Li, W., & Zhang, L. (2015). Audit mode change, corporate governance and audit effort. China Journal of Accounting Research, 8(4), 315-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2015.05.002

Chu, O., & Hakim, A. (2015). The Role of Cost Breakdown Structure in Life Cycle Cost Model Jurnal Teknologi The Role of Cost Breakdown Structure in Life Cycle Cost Model. 2(November), 117-121.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications.

De Florio, F. (2011). Continued Airworthiness and Operation (F. B. T.-A. (Second E. De Florio (ed.); pp. 243-319). Butterworth-Heinemann. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-096802-5.10009-1

Dehmer, M., Meyer-Nieberg, S., Mihelcic, G., Pickl, S., & Zsifkovits, M. (2015). Collaborative risk management for national security and strategic foresight: Combining qualitative and quantitative operations research approaches. EURO Journal on Decision Processes, 3(3), 305-337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40070-015-0046-0

Dorri, M., Yarmohammadian, M. H., & Nadi, M. A. (2012). A Review on Value Chain in Higher Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 3842-3846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.157

Dost, F., & Geiger, I. (2017). Value-based pricing in competitive situations with the help of multi-product price response maps. Journal of Business Research, 76, 219-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.01.004

Gessinger, G. H. (2009). An Introduction to Company Structure and Organization (G. H. B. T.-M. and I. P. D. Gessinger (ed.); pp. 29-51). Butterworth-Heinemann. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-85617-559-3.00002-8

Hoyt, R. E., & Liebenberg, A. P. (2011). The Value of Enterprise Risk Management. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 78(4), 795-822. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6975.2011.01413.x

Johnston, J., & Soileau, J. (2020). Enterprise risk management and accruals estimation error. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 16(3), 100209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2020.100209

Knauer, T., & Möslang, K. (2018). The adoption and benefits of life cycle costing. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 14(2), 188-215. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-04-2016-0027

Knoll, D., Prüglmeier, M., & Reinhart, G. (2016). Predicting Future Inbound Logistics Processes Using Machine Learning. Procedia CIRP, 52, 145-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.078

Korpi, E., & Ala-Risku, T. (2008). Life cycle costing: a review of published case studies. Managerial Auditing Journal, 23(3), 240-261. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900810857703

Levy, M., & Powell, P. (2005). Role of core competencies in developing ISS in knowledge-based SMEs (M. Levy & P. B. T.-S. for G. in Sme. Powell (eds.); pp. 265-291). Butterworth-Heinemann. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-075066351-9/50018-8

Malik, M. F., Zaman, M., & Buckby, S. (2020). Enterprise risk management and firm performance: Role of the risk committee. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 16(1), 100178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2019.100178

Meidell, A., & Kaarbøe, K. (2017). How the enterprise risk management function influences decision-making in the organization - A field study of a large, global oil and gas company. The British Accounting Review, 49(1), 39-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2016.10.005

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2014). Qualitative data analysis (illustrate). SAGE.

Miller, J., & Jones, R. (2013). Managing Risks in Business: A Proven Practices Presentation (J. Miller & R. B. T.-M. R. in B. Jones (eds.); p. 1). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-416553-3.00001-5

Ostrowska, M., & Mazur, S. (2015). Risk in A Crisis Situation. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23(October 2014), 1054-1059. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00373-1

Padgett, J. E., Dennemann, K., & Ghosh, J. (2010). Risk-based seismic life-cycle cost-benefit (LCC-B) analysis for bridge retrofit assessment. Structural Safety, 32(3), 165-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.10.003

Paltrinieri, N., & Khan, F. I. (2020). Chapter Two - Dynamic risk analysis-Fundamentals. In F. I. Khan & P. R. B. T.-M. in C. P. S. Amyotte (Eds.), Advanced Methods of Risk Assessment and Management (Vol. 4, pp. 35-60). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.mcps.2020.04.001

Quon, T. K., Zeghal, D., & Maingot, M. (2012). Enterprise Risk Management and Firm Performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62, 263-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.042

Renault, B. Y., Agumba, J. N., & Balogun, O. A. (2016). Drivers for and Obstacles to Enterprise Risk Management in Construction Firms: A Literature Review. Procedia Engineering, 164, 402-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.637

Rodrigues-da-Silva, L. H., & Crispim, J. A. (2014). The Project Risk Management Process, a Preliminary Study. Procedia Technology, 16, 943-949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2014.10.047

Roper, S., & Tapinos, E. (2016). Taking risks in the face of uncertainty: An exploratory analysis of green innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 112, 357-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.07.037

Rothenberg, A. D., Gaduh, A., Burger, N. E., Chazali, C., Tjandraningsih, I., Radikun, R., Sutera, C., & Weilant, S. (2016). Rethinking Indonesia's Informal Sector. World Development, 80, 96-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.11.005

Santeramo, F. G., & Lamonaca, E. (2021). Objective risk and subjective risk: The role of information in food supply chains. Food Research International, 139, 109962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109962

Sesana, M. M., & Salvalai, G. (2013). Overview on life cycle methodologies and economic feasibility for nZEBs. Building and Environment, 67, 211-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.05.022

Soltanizadeh, S., Rasid, S. Z. A., Golshan, N., Quoquab, F., & Basiruddin, R. (2014). Enterprise Risk Management Practices among Malaysian Firms. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 164, 332-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.084

Spira, L. F., & Page, M. (2003). Risk management: The reinvention of internal control and the changing role of internal audit. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 16(4), 640-661. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570310492335

Spr?i?, D. M., Kožul, A., & Pecina, E. (2015). State and Perspectives of Enterprise Risk Management System Development - The Case of Croatian Companies. Procedia Economics and Finance, 30, 768-779. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01326-X

Wang, H. (2018). Life-cycle analysis of repair of concrete pavements. In F. Pacheco-Torgal, R. E. Melchers, X. Shi, N. De Belie, K. Van Tittelboom, & A. B. T.-E.-E. R. and R. of C. I. Sáez (Eds.), Woodhead Publishing Series in Civil and Structural Engineering (pp. 723-738). Woodhead Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102181-1.00025-3