Environmental Management Accounting Based on the Tri Hita Karana Concept: Interpretation and Practice at Village Credit Institutions (LPD) in Bali

Authors

  • Komang Adi Kurniawan Saputra Universitas Warmadewa
  • Putu Ayu Sita Laksmi Warmadewa University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38142/ijesss.v7i3.1825

Keywords:

Environmental Management Accounting, Tri Hita Karana, Green Banking, Village Credit Institutions, Sustainability

Abstract

This study aims to examine how environmental management accounting (EMA) is implemented in Village Credit Institutions (LPDs) in Bali, based on the local wisdom philosophy of Tri Hita Karana. The research approach used was qualitative with an interpretive paradigm, using an intrinsic case study of LPDs across nine regencies/cities in Bali. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with LPD administrators, observation, and document analysis, and then analyzed using thematic analysis techniques. The results indicate that EMA practices in LPDs are not yet formally structured within a monetary accounting system, but have been internalized in values, policies, and decision-making oriented toward harmonious relationships between humans and God (Parahyangan), fellow humans (Pawongan), and the environment (Palemahan). Environmental management is realized through energy savings, waste reduction, environmentally friendly financing, and consideration of ecological aspects in credit granting. The Tri Hita Karana philosophy serves as an ethical and cultural framework that strengthens the legitimacy of sustainable practices, although it is not yet supported by a comprehensive environmental cost measurement system. This research contributes to the development of an EMA concept contextualized with local wisdom and demonstrates that cultural values ​​can be an important foundation for building community-based sustainable banking practices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bose, S., & Khan, H. Z. (2012). The role of environmental management accounting and voluntary disclosure in corporate environmental strategy. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 20(4), 309–329.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Burritt, R. L., Hahn, T., & Schaltegger, S. (2019). Sustainability accounting and reporting: Fad or trend? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(7), 2079–2094.

Jasch, C. (2009). Environmental and Material Flow Cost Accounting: Principles and Procedures. Dordrecht: Springer.

Jeucken, M. (2001). Sustainable Finance and Banking: The Financial Sector and the Future of the Planet. London: Earthscan.

Lestari, D., & Priyanto, B. (2020). Implementasi green banking dan kinerja keberlanjutan perbankan di Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 17(2), 123–140.

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK). (2021). Roadmap Keuangan Berkelanjutan Tahap II (2021–2025). Jakarta: OJK.

Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. (2000). Contemporary Environmental Accounting: Issues, Concepts and Practice. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.

Sudibya, G. A., & Dana, I. M. (2018). Tri Hita Karana sebagai dasar pengembangan model bisnis berkelanjutan di Bali. Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan, 20(1), 1–10.

Suaryana, A. (2007). Konsep Tri Hita Karana dalam pembangunan berkelanjutan di Bali. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Bisnis, 2(1), 1–16.

United Nations Division for Sustainable Development (UNDSD). (2001). Environmental Management Accounting: Procedures and Principles. New York: United Nations.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>