Analysis of Potential Hazards and Risk in Engineering, Procurement & Constructions Services Project for Deconstraint Facility Construction Using Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) Method at PT Raga Perkasa Ekaguna (RPE) Duri, Riau

Authors

  • Deri Arfiansyah Sahid University, Indonesia
  • Ekaterina Setyowati Sahid University, Indonesia
  • Soehatman Ramli Sahid University, Indonesia

Keywords:

Potential Hazards and High Risks, FMEA, RPN, Hazard Potential Control

Abstract

The Deconstraint facility construction project is a process to install a new Water Injection System with a capacity of 100,000 BWPD, which is distributed through 2 (two) water injection headers at Grand Station and its supporting facilities. The purpose of this study is to assess the risk of potential hazards and risks that will occur if a failure occurs in the EPC process of the Deconstraint Facility Construction using the FMEA (Failure Mode and Effect Analysis) method. This research method uses descriptive-analytical with a qualitative and quantitative approach with data collection techniques using observation, interviews, and triangulation. The results of this study state the highest Risk Priority Number (RPN) value with a value of 100 (one hundred), which is in the failure of lifting and rigging during the installation of the pump caused by the failure of lifting equipment due to calculation errors while the lowest RPN value with a result value of 6 (six) is in the drawing and design making activities with the potential for failure is in errors in making the design that is made wrong. Controlling potential hazards and risks resulting from lifting equipment failures was explored through human, method, machine, and environmental factors. The conclusion of this study is that failures in lifting and rigging during pump installation, caused by miscalculations of the lifting equipment used, had the highest score.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aprianto, T., Setiawan, I., & Purba, H. H. (2021). Implementasi metode Failure Mode and Effect Analysis pada Industri di Asia – Kajian Literature. Matrik, 21(2), 165

International Organization for Standardization. 45001:2018. Occupational health and safety management systems

Direktorat Jenderal Minyak dan Gas Bumi, Kementrian Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral. (2024). Statistik Kecelakaan Kerja Tahun 2023. Hal 82

Mc Dermott, R. E., Mikulak, R. J., Beauregard, M. R. (2009). The Basics of FMEA. 2nd Edition. New York: Productivity Press

Peruzzi, A., Kriswardhana, W., Ratnaningsih, A. (2020). Risk Assessment Kecelakaan Kerja dengan Menggunakan Metode Domino pada Proyek Apartemen Grand Dharmahusada Lagoon. Siklus Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 103-116. doi: 10.31849/siklus.v6i2.4337

Popov, Georgi., Lyon K Bruce., Hollcroft, Bruce. (2016). Risk Assessment A Practical Guide to Assessing Operational Risk

Ramli, Soehatman. (2018). Manajemen Risiko Dalam Perspektif K3 OHS Risk Management Berbasis ISO 31.000. Jakarta : Prosafe

Shafiee M, Enjema E, Kolios A. 2019b. An integrated FTAFMEA model for risk analysis of engineering systems: a case study of subsea blowout preventers. Applied Sciences. 9(6):1192. doi.org/10.3390/app9061192

Sugiyono. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung. Alfabeta

Vecchia, Marco., et al. (2025). Healthcare Application of Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA): Is There Room in the Infectious Disease Setting? A Scoping Review. Healthcare, 13, 82. doi.org/10.3390/ healthcare13010082

Downloads

Published

2026-01-30