Reconstructing Environmental Ethics Through FGD: A Case Study of River Conservation and Local Myths Demystification in Pakis Kembar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38142/ijesss.v7i3.1731Keywords:
Focus Group Discussion (FGD), Participatory Action Research (PAR), Waste Management, Local MythsAbstract
This study examines the reconstruction of environmental ethics in Pakis Kembar Village through Focus Group Discussion (FGD) within the frameworkParticipatory Action Research (PAR). The background of the study focuses on the high level of domestic waste accumulation and the practice of dumping waste into rivers influenced by local myths, namely throwing baby diapers into rivers. This study conducted an FGD on November 5, 2025, using a PAR approach involving local governments, religious leaders, local communities, academics, practitioners, and the private sector to explore the roots of socio-cultural problems and formulate community-based solutions. The results of the study indicate that waste management problems are not only caused by limited infrastructure, but also by mental models and local knowledge systems.(indigenous knowledge system). Through inter-epistemological dialogue, FGD effectively facilitates the process of demystifying local myths, building collective awareness, identifying local champions, and producing the compilation master plan eco edu tourism, a river conservation roadmap that integrates environmental education, value change, and technical interventions. However, the implementation of this initiative still faces challenges, such as the need for long-term mentoring, strengthening women's representation, and implementing technical ideas into real-world practice. Based on these results, this study recommends strategies value-based intervention, integration of practice-based environmental education, and strengthening cross-regional networks to support upstream and downstream conservation.
Downloads
References
Afandi, A. (2020). Participatory Action Research (PAR): An alternative methodology for transformative research and community service. Research-Based Community Service Workshop Material, LP2M UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, February 22, 2020.
Domestic Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Home Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia. (2025).Zero Waste Management (MASARO). Tuxedovation. https://tuxedovation.inovasi.bskdn.kemendagri.go.id/detail_inovasi/144926
Kaza, S., Yao, L., Bhada-Tata, P., & Van Woerden, F. (2018). What a waste 2.0: A global snapshot of solid waste management to 2050. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1329-0
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2005). Participatory action research: Communicative action and the public sphere. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., p. 559). Sage Publications.
Ministry of Environment and Forestry of the Republic of Indonesia. (2024).National Waste Management Information System (SIPSN). https://sipsn.kemenlh.go.id/sipsn/
United Nations Development Programme. (2025). Sustainable Development Goals. UNDP. Retrieved November 14, 2025, from https://www.undp.org/sustainable-development-goals
United Nations Environment Programme. (2021). From pollution to solution: A global assessment of marine litter and plastic pollution. UNEP.
United Nations Environment Programme. (2024). Global Waste Management Outlook 2024: Beyond an age of waste - Turning rubbish into a resource. UNEP. https://wedocs.unep.org/20.500.11822/44939
Universal Eco. (2025). Definition and concept of sanitary landfill. Universal Eco. https://universaleco.id/pengertian-dan-konsep-sanitary-landfill/
World Bank. (2021). Plastic waste discharges from rivers and coastlines in Indonesia. Marine Plastics Series, East Asia and Pacific Region.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Anggun Trisnanto Hari Susilo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.














