Implementation of the Laong Pantar Model in Village Government Implementation in Sumbawa Regency

Sofyan HARYADI; Titi  WIDANINGSIH; Nafiah  ARIANI; Kholil KHOLIl

doi:10.38142/ijesss.v6i6.1679

Authors

Sofyan HARYADI Sahid University, Indonesia
Titi WIDANINGSIH Sahid University, Indonesia
Nafiah ARIANI Sahid University, Indonesia
Kholil KHOLIl Sahid University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38142/ijesss.v6i6.1679

Keywords:

Laong Pantar, Village Political Elites, Formal Communication

Abstract

The high intensity of formal communication, Laong Pantar communication between village political elites, the community results in a decrease in trust. A high level of uncertainty in a relationship causes a decrease in the level of intimacy of the communication content, resulting in a high level of reciprocity (feedback). (West & Turner: 2013: 150). Someone feels uncomfortable in a relationship because they feel they are not part of the group members Gudykunts and Kim (2003). Trying to find a way out to develop a new concept or communication model. How to apply the Laong Pantar model in the implementation of village government in Sumbawa district. What are the motives for understanding and disagreement within the village political elite and the community regarding the discourse of implementing Laong Pantar. Which is more dominant between santripetal motives and santrifugal motives within the political elite and the community regarding the discourse of implementing Laong Pantar in the implementation of village government. This type of research is descriptive qualitative, natural observation, Data collection uses observation, in-depth interviews, structured interviews and documentation. The results of the study show that the Laong Pantar implementation model desired by the political elite and the community is the elaborative final communication model. The motives for disagreement among political elites are habitual or accustomed to formal communication. This is due to a decline in trust in one's own culture, along with increased workload and political motives.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anonim. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, ISSN, 2722,08467. Vol. 4. September, 2020.

ISSN,2776-6284/P-ISS;2301-8

Arni Muhammad, 2005 Komunikasi Organisasi. Cet.7 Jakarta Bumi Aksara.

Arifin, H., Hamidsyukrie, Z. M., & Ilyas, M. (2023). Nilai sosial kearifan lokal nggahi rawi pahu dan penyimpangan di kalangan pemuda kelurahan kandai dua dompu. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 8(3).

Artis.2011. Strategi Komunikasi Publik Relations. Jurnal sosial budaya:B (2) 184- 179.

Akbar, M. F., Putubasai, E., & Asmaria, A. (2019). Peran Komunikasi Dalam Pembangunan Masyarakat. Komunika, 2(2), 111-127.

Atikah, N., & Rifa’i, A. (2023). Akulturasi Budaya pada Pernikahan Etnis Mandailing dan Minangkabau di Pasaman. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 7(3), 20526-20533.

Ayuningtyas, Reina Hapsari, and Amni Zarkasyi Rahman. "Komunikasi Kebijakan Publik dalam Implementasi Program Kampung Tematik di Kelurahan Rejomulyo Kota Semarang." (2019).

Aksa, Y. A. D. (2018) Media Konvensional & Sosialisasi Pemerintah Desa. : Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi, Bahasa, dan Budaya, 3(2),1-19.

Burgon. Michael, 1974, Approaching Speech communications New York Holt Rinehart & Wiston.

Barton, Wiland Beck, Andrew.2005. Ger Set for Kommunication Studies (Get Set for University EUP). Edinburgh University Perss.

Bajari Anwar & Salaha Tua Saragih. 2011. Komunikasi Tekstual dan Teori Praktek Komunikasi Kontemporer. PT Remaja Rosda Karya, Bandung.

Berger, C.R., & Calabrese, R.J. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond:Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1, 99-112.

Cissna, Kenneth. N., dan Rob Anderson., The Contributions of Carl R. Rogers Philophical Praxis of Dialogue”. Westrim Journal of Space Communiction.54.1990.

Creswell John W, 2013, Research Design Pendekatan Koalitatif, Kuantitatif, Yogyakarta Pustaka.

Cangara Hafied, 2014, Perencanaan & Strategi Komunikasi, Rajagrafindo Persada.

Cassata Merry B dan Molefi K . A. Sante 1999. Massa Communication Prinsiples and Praktices New York MAemillan.

Cooley Charles H, 1902. Human Nature and Social Order. New Bruns wick Transaction Books.

Daud, R. F., & Novrimansyah, E. A. (2022). Strategi Komunikasi Pembangunan Berkelanjutan Berbasis Kearifan Lokal Pada Daerah Wisata Di Provinsi Lampung. Independen: Jurnal Politik Indonesia Dan Global, 3(2), 13-28.

Don F Faules R Wayne, 2010, Komunikasi Organisasi, PT Remaja Rosda Karya. Donald Granberg, Teori Penilaian Sosial, Annals of the International Communication Association, Vol 6, No 1, 1982, 304-329.

Didiek Rahmannadji, Loc. Cit. hlm. 218

Didik Hariyanto, Pengantar Ilmu Komunikasi UMSIDA Press, Cetakan pertama, Agustus 2021, Jawa Timur

Edi Purwanto, Privatisasi Ruang Publik Dari Civic Centre Menjadi Central Business District (Belajar dari Kasus Kawasan Simpang Lima Semarang) Privatization Of Public Space From Civic Centre To Central Business District (A case study of Simpang Lima Area Semarang) TATA LOKA Volume 16 Nomor 3, Agustus 2014, 153-167

Eriyanto,2001, Analisis Wacana LKIS Yogyakarta

- 2014, Analisis Jaringan Komunikasi, Kencana.

Eirles J 1994. Communicating In Commonity An Introdaction To Social Comminication. Manila (PH) Logos Publication.

Etin Indrayani , e-Government Konsep, Implementasi dan Perkembangannya di Indonesia, LPP Balai Insan Cendekia, Sumatera Barat

Friedrichs, D., Schoultz, I., & Jordanoska, A. (2017). Edwin H. Sutherland.

Routledge.

Faisal Sanapiah, 2013, Pengumpulan Data dan Analisis Data Dalam Penelitian Kualitatif, PT Raja Grapindo Persada.

Farid, A. S. (2020). Strategi peningkatan kualitas komunikasi publik di level pemerintahan desa. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 1(4), 813-820.

Faruk. (1994) Pengantar Sosiologi Sastra dari Strukturalisme Genetik sampai Post Modernisme Pustaka Pelajar Yogyakarta.

Fishbein Martin 1980. Anderstanding Atittudes of Predicting Behavior

Engelewood Clieffs , NJ, Prentice, Hall

Gudykunst William B,. dan Kim Young Yun. Communicating With Strangers An Approach to Intercultural Communication, Edisi ke 2 (New York MxGraw-Hill,1992).

Geertz Clifford, 1992, The Interpretations Of Culture, Slected Essy, London (1914) Versi Indonesia, Tafsir Kebudayaan, Togtakarta Tatasan Kanisios.

Gidden Anthony,2003 The Constitutions Of Society, Futu Printika.

Harun Hadiwijono, (1994). Sari Sejarah Filsafat Barat , Yogyakarta: Kanisius. Hidayat Dasrun. 2012. Komunikasi Antarpribadi dan Medianya.3 Yogyakarta

Graha Ilmu.

Hatta, 1983, Alam Pikiran Yatmani, Jakarta: Tintamas

Hidayat, D. R. (2013). Faktor-faktor penyebab kemunculan prasangka sosial (social prejudice) pada pelajar. Jurnal Ilmiah Mimbar Demokrasi, 12(2), 40-54.

H Cooley Charles 1983 Human Nature An Social Arder New Brunswick Trans- Action Book.

Hantono, D., & Pramitasari, D. (2018). Aspek perilaku manusia sebagai makhluk individu dan sosial pada ruang terbuka publik. Nature: National Academic Journal of Architecture, 5(2), 85-93

Hall Edward. T. 1973. The silent Language. Garden City, NY Anchor Books. Imaddudin, I., & Syafrina, A. E. (2022). Sinergi Informasi Pemerintah Melalui

Komunikasi Publik Dalam Penanganan Pandemi Virus Covid-19 Di Indonesia. Gandiwa Jurnal Komunikasi, 2(1), 32-40.

Jalaluddin Rahmat, 2007 Psikologi Komunikasi PT Remaja Rosdakarya Bandung.

K. Bertens, (1975). Sejarah Filsafat Yunani, Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Kotler, Philip and Eduardo I Robert.1989, Sosial Marketing Strategies For Changing Public Behavior. New York, the Free Press. A Divisions of Mscmilland,Inc.

Koentjaraningrat, Manusia dan Kebudayaan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Djambatan, 1983. --------------------, Pengantar Ilmu Antropologi, Cet. 8. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2002.