Governance Dimension and Sustainable Development in Nigeria’s Telecommunication Sector: Social, Environmental, and Economic Decarbonization Pathways.

Authors

  • Lateef Abdulsalam QHSES Leadership Academy, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38142/ijesss.v7i3.1673

Keywords:

Decarbonization, Emission, Governance, Sustainable, Telecommunication

Abstract

In response to growing global demands for sustainable development, this study explores how governance structures within the telecommunication sector influence organizational commitment to sustainability. Specifically, it examines the relationship between sustainable development efforts and three core governance dimensions: social governance, environmental governance, and economic decarbonization. Grounded in institutional theory, the study hypothesizes that stronger governance across these domains is positively associated with higher levels of sustainability commitment. Using Pearson correlation analysis on a sample of 95 telecommunication entities, the results reveal statistically significant positive correlations across all dimensions. The strongest association was observed between sustainable development and social governance (r = 0.472, p < 0.001), followed by economic decarbonization (r = 0.437, p < 0.001), and environmental governance (r = 0.373, p < 0.001). These findings suggest that while each governance domain contributes meaningfully to sustainability efforts, none alone serves as a dominant predictor. The moderate strength of these correlations underscores the importance of a holistic, integrated governance approach that simultaneously addresses social equity, environmental stewardship, and economic transformation. This research offers actionable insights for policymakers, corporate leaders, and sustainability practitioners aiming to align governance strategies with sustainable development goals in the telecommunication industry.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andrei, M., et al. (2021). Decarbonization of industry: Guidelines towards harmonized energy efficiency policy program impact evaluation methodology. Energy Reports, 7, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.02.087

Atchike, D. W., et al. (2022). Towards sustainable energy: Factors affecting solar power system adoption by small and medium-sized businesses. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, Article 967284.

This open-access article is distributed under a

Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-NC) 4.0 license

Bisbey, A., et al. (2020). Enhancing the efficiency of infrastructure projects to improve access to finance. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 4(1).

Dar, S. A., & Lone, N. A. (2022). Mobile technology's role in meeting sustainable development goals. Journal of Technology Innovations and Energy, 1(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.56556/jtie.v1i2.180

Datta, P., et al. (2015). The impact of sustainable governance and practices on business performance: An empirical investigation of global firms. International Journal of Sustainable Society, 7(2), 97–120. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSOC.2015.069912

Deevela, N. R., et al. (2023). A review of renewable energy-based power supply options for telecom towers. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 31(5), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-02917-7

Drozdż, W., et al. (2021). Determinants of decarbonization—How to realize sustainable and low-carbon cities. Energies, 14, Article 2640, 1–20.

Fankhauser, S., et al. (2022). The meaning of net zero and how to get it right. Nature Climate Change, 12(1), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01245-w

Gebrehiwet, Y. G. (2022). The effect of governance practices on the performance of saving and credit cooperatives: Evidence from Central Zone, Tigray, Ethiopia. International Journal of Development and Sustainability, 11(3), 62–86.

Gupta, L., & Gupta, V. K. (2018). Going green—Methods and initiatives in the telecom sector for energy management. Journal of Telecommunications System & Management, 7(167), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0919.1000167

Jenkins, J., et al. (2021). Mission Net-Zero America: The nation-building path to a prosperous, net-zero emissions economy. Joule, 5(10), 2755–2781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2021.10.016

Oliyide, R. O., & Olugbemi, M. F. (2024). Renewable electricity generation: Solution to GHG emissions in the Nigerian telecom industry. World Journal of Engineering and Technology, 12, 885–894. https://doi.org/10.4236/wjet.2024.124054

Papadis, E., & Tsatsaronis, G. (2020). Challenges in the decarbonization of the energy sector. Energy, Article 118025, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118025

Pranugrahaning, A., et al. (2020). Corporate sustainability assessments in the information and communication technology sector in Malaysia. Sustainability, 12, Article 9271.

Sebastian, O., et al. (2020). Global governance for the decarbonization of energy-intensive industries: Great potential underexploited. Earth System Governance, 4, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2020.100072

Sivasakthivel, T., et al. (2011). Ozone layer depletion and its effects: A review. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 2(1), 30–37.

Tern, N., & Valero, A. (2021). Innovation, growth and the transition to net-zero emissions. Research Policy, 50(9), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104293

Tillekeratne, D., et al. (2020). Renewable energy for mobile towers: Opportunities for low- and middle-income countries. GSMA, 1–20. https://www.gsma.com/CleanTech

UNCTAD. (2022). Key priorities in charting decarbonization pathways in least developed countries. UNCTAD/ALDC/2022/10, 1–30.

Wesseling, H., et al. (2017). The transition of energy-intensive processing industries towards deep decarbonization: Characteristics and implications for future research. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 79, 1303–1313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.156

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30