Party-Id and Money Politics in The Dynamics of The 2024 Presidential and Vice Presidential Elections in Kupang City

Frans Bertho Ricky HUMAU; Ananias Riyoan Philip JACOB; Stefanus TRIADMAJA; Philips Yuniory Nyaleson  NDODA

doi:10.38142/ijesss.v6i1.1284

Authors

Frans Bertho Ricky HUMAU Nusa Cendana University, Indonesia
Ananias Riyoan Philip JACOB Nusa Cendana University, Indonesia
Stefanus TRIADMAJA Nusa Cendana University, Indonesia
Philips Yuniory Nyaleson NDODA Nusa Cendana University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38142/ijesss.v6i1.1284

Keywords:

Party Identification, Money Politics, Elections, Kupang City

Abstract

The weakening of party identification has become a unique phenomenon from year to year, in the context of elections this weakening has caused several negative effects, one of which is the practice of money politics that is increasingly massive in society. In other words, strong party identification will reduce the practice of money politics. This hypothesis will be tried to be proven by this research by looking at the influence of party identification on money politics that occurs in the community, especially in the Presidential and Vice Presidential Elections in Kupang City in 2024. The method used in this study is a quantitative method using a survey technique of 440 respondents spread across six sub-districts in Kupang City. The conclusion obtained in this study is that party identification does not have a positive impact on public acceptance of money politics. The weak identification of parties in Kupang City is caused by the structure and institutionalization of political parties that are not running optimally. On the other hand, the people of Kupang City tend to prioritize a person's character rather than party identification. The results of the 2024 election again prove that the identification of community parties in Kupang City is still quite low.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Maddox, WS, & Nimmo, D. (1981). Mencari Pembagi Tiket. Ilmu Sosial Kuartely, 62(3), 401.

Mujani, S., Liddle, W., & ambardi., K. (2011). Kuasa rakyat, analisis tentang perilaku memilih dalam pemilihan legislatif dan presiden Indonesia pasca-orde baru. Jakarta: Mizan Publika.

Bone, HA, & Ranney, A. (1981). Politik dan Pemilih. McGraw-Hill.

Aspinall, E., & Berenschot, W. (2019). Demokrasi untuk Dijual: Pemilu, Klientelisme, dan Negara di Indonesia. Itacha: Pers Universitas Cornell.

Cagé, J. (2020). Harga Demokrasi: . Bagaimana Uang Membentuk Politik dan Apa yang Harus Dilakukan Mengatasinya: Harvard University Press.

Priyono, EA, & Hamid, U. (2014). Merancang arah baru demokrasi: Indonesia pasca-reformasi. Jakarta: Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia.

Kavanagh, D. (1983). Ilmu Politik dan Perilaku Politik. London: Allen & Unwin.

Apriani, KD (2020). ID PARTAI DAN KECENDERUNGAN PEMBELIAN SUARA DI BALI: STUDI KASUS PILKADA 2018. Jurnal Adhyasta Pemilu.

Biorcio, R., & Mannheimer, R. (1995). Keterkaitan antara warga negara dan partai politik.

Muhtadi, B. (2013). Politik Uang dan dinamika pemilu di Indonesia: studi awal interaksi antara partai-id dan klien patron. Jurnal Pusat Penelitian Politik.

LSI. (2021). Evaluasi Publik Terhadap Kondisi Nasional dan Peta Awal Pemilu 2024. Jakarta: Lembaga Survei Indonesia.