Audit of It Process Ai-02 CobIt in Academic Information System (Case Study on Several Vocational Higher education in Bandung)

Authors

  • Rendra Trisyanto SURYA Politeknik Negeri Bandung, Indonesia
  • Anthon Simon Yohanis KERIHI Nusa Cendana University, Indonesia
  • Murhaban MURHABAN Malikussaleh University, Lhokseumawe
  • Ashanul HAQ Politeknik Negeri Banjarmasin, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38142/jogta.v2i3.941

Keywords:

SIAK, IT Governance, Maturity Score, IT Process AI-02

Abstract

The development of Information Technology (IT) allows the Academic Information System (SIAK) to become a central element in the management process of Higher Education, primarily Academic. On the other hand, the sophistication of IT in SIAK develops a variety of new risks (IT Risks) that accompany it if not managed properly. Therefore, the maturity level of SIAK management determines the performance of the academic activity process. In SIAK, the element that determines system performance is Application Software. The results of this study indicate that IT Process AI-02 (Procurement of Application Software) Vocational Higher Education in Bandung, as measured based on COBIT standards, is still at the 2.1 level. This means a part/function (management) already handles Software Procurement but is still "Repeatable but intuitive." Because it is managed sporadic and only refers to leadership policies with limited control over IT/SIAK. From the radar chart of the research results, it can be seen that the prominent role of IT Process AI-02 is the aspect (indicator) of "Approval," "Technical Support from Vendors," and focus on handling the problem of "data integration" because many universities are in the transition period from old IT to new IT. Other indicators (COBIT requirements) still need to be higher (meaning they have not become a concern) when the AIS procurement process is carried out.

 

References

Eryurek, E., Gilad, U., Lakshmanan, V., Kibunguchy-Grant, A., & Ashdown, J. (2021). Data Governance: The Definitive Guide. " O'Reilly Media, Inc.".

Isaca. (2013). COBIT 5: Enabling information. ISA.

Isaca. (2012). COBIT 5: A business framework for the governance and management of enterprise IT. Isaca.

Isaca Framework. (2013). COBIT 5: Implementation.

Indrajit, E. (2008). Mengukur Tingkat Kematangan Pemanfataan Teknologi Informasi Institusi Pendidikan (Suatu Pendekatan Kesiapan Pemegang Kepentingan/Stakeholder), STMKB Perbanas, Jakarta.

Juanita, L. (2009). Audit Sistem Informasi Akademik Menggunakan Standar COBIT 4.0 Domain Deliver and Support (Studi et al.), an unpublished Thesis, Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen Infoematika & Teknik Komputer, Surabaya, 2009.

Maria, E., Charitas, F. (2012). The measurement of IT Performance in Indonesia Higher Education Institutions in the context of Achieving Institution Business Goals using COBIT Framework Ver 4.1 (Case Study: Satyawana Christian University). Journal of Arts, Science & Commerce, Vol-III, Issue 3, July 2012.

Oltsik, J. (2003). IT governance: Is it the answer? TechRepublic. Retrieved January 29, 2008 from http://www.zdnet.com.au/insight/toolkit/itmanagement/process

Surendra, K. (2009). Implementasi Tata Kelola Teknologi Informasi, Penerbit Informatika, Bandung, Indonesia.

Team, I. G. I. (2000). COBIT 3rd Edition Management Guidelines. USA: IT Governance Institute.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-31