Moderation Of Moral Identity In Ethical Judgement And Moral Intention Accounting Students

Authors

  • Riski Aprillia NITA University of Hayam Wuruk Perbanas, Indonesia
  • Putri WULANDITYA University of Hayam Wuruk Perbanas, Indonesia
  • Nurul Hasanah Uswati DEWI University of Hayam Wuruk Perbanas, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38142/jogta.v2i1.716

Keywords:

Moral identity, Ethical judgement, Moral intention, Accounting Students

Abstract

This study aims to determine the factors influencing ethical considerations and moral intentions (such as gender, perceived moral intensity, and perceived moral culture) with moral identity as a moderator. This study uses a survey method for data collection. The research respondents were 169 Hayam Wuruk Perbanas University accounting students who had taken audit courses—data analysis technique using SEM-PLS. The study results show that (1) ethical judgment is only influenced by perceived moral culture. In contrast, moral intention can be influenced by gender, perceived moral intensity, perceived moral culture with moral intention, and moral identity. (2) Moral identity can be a moderator of the effect of perceived moral intensity on moral intention and the influence of perceived moral culture on ethical judgment. This finding has implications for universities to provide a learning process about ethical dilemma cases not only in ethics courses but also in competency courses such as auditing practice.

References

Apriyana, K., and Puspita, L. M. N. (2018). Ethical sensitivity and moral considerations of accounting students toward business dilemma, 8 (1): 27-39.

Aquino, K., Freeman, D., Reed II, A., Lim, V. K., and Felps, W. (2009). Testing a social-cognitive model of moral behavior: the interactive influence of situations and moral identity centrality. Journal of personality and social psychology, 97 (1), 123.

Fery, I. (2021). Pengaruh tata kelola perusahaan, pertimbangan etis, pengambilan keputusan terhadap pencegahan kecurangan dengan sistem pengendalian internal. Accounting Information Systems And Information Technology Business Enterprise, 6 (2), 136-150.

Neesham, C., and Gu, J. (2015). Strengthening moral judgment: A moral identity based leverage strategy in business ethics education. Journal of Business Ethics, 131, 527-534.

Pierce, B., and Sweeney, B.(2004). Cost quality conflict in audit firms: an empirical investigation. European accounting review, 13 (3): 415-441.

Pramesti, A., and Wulanditya, P. (2021). Studi eksperimen: Moralitas individu, kesesuaian kompensasi, dan kecenderungan kecurangan akuntansi. AKUNESA: Jurnal Akuntansi Unesa, 9(3): 99-110.

Suliani, M., & Marsono. (2010). Pengaruh pertimbangan etis, perilaku machiavelian, dan gender dalam pembuatan keputusan etis mahasiswa s1 akuntansi. Jurnal Akuntansi & Auditing, 7 (1), 62-79.

Singhapakdi, A., and Vitell, S. J. (1990). Marketing ethics: Factors influencing perceptions of ethical problems and alternatives. Journal of Macromarketing, 12 (1): 4-18.

Sweeney, B., Arnold, D., and Pierce, B. (2007). ‘Audit seniors’ ethical decision making and contextual variables’, Paper presented at the 17th National Auditing Conference, Dublin, 23–24 March.

Ulum, I., Juanda, A., and Leniwati, D. (2021). Metodologi penelitian akuntansi (Edisi 3). Malang: Baskara Media.

Yusnaini, Y., and Meirawati, E. (2023). Moral intensity and ethical analysis in accounting decision making. Akuntabilitas, 17 (1): 35-47.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-31