Implementation Of Activity Program Planning And Budget Accountability In Efforts To Increase The Performance Of State Universities (Case Study at Kupang State Agricultural Polytechnic)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38142/jogta.v1i2.437Keywords:
Accountability, Budget, PerformanceAbstract
The Kupang State Politani Strategic Plan (Renstra) for 2015-2019 is the primary reference in preparing the Work Plan (Renja) and Budget Work Plan (RKA). Therefore each work unit is required to propose and align activities in the Strategic Plan so that it will be more focused and planned in achieving the targets that have been set. However, in its implementation, many obstacles were found in the program and budget preparation process, where some of the processes needed to meet the activity performance indicators previously set in the strategic plan. This research is qualitative, with primary and secondary data collected through interviews, documentation and observation. Then the data collected is analyzed using data analysis techniques from Miles & Huberman consisting of three streams of activities that coincide, namely: data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion/verification. The results of the study found that the accountability of program planning activities and budgets to improve performance at the Kupang State Polytechnic was analyzed using the Process accountability model, namely; (a) fast service to activity program planning and budgeting, (b) responsive to activity program planning and budgeting and (c) low cost to activity program planning and budget has not been fulfilled while for inhibiting factors the accountability of activity program planning and budgeting to improve performance at the Kupang State Politany are; (a) human resource performance, (b) incidental or emergency priority needs that must be used at that time and, (c) leadership changes that can change program planning
activities and budgets at the Kupang State Politani.
References
Bastian, I., 2006. Sistem Perencanaan dan Penganggaran Pemerintah Daerah di Indonesia. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Djalil, Rizal. 2014. Akuntabilitas Keuangan Daerah Implementasi Pasca. Reformasi. Jakarta: PT Semesta Rakyat Merdeka
Dwiyanto, A., dkk. 2003. Reformasi Tata Pemerintahan dan Otonomi Daerah. Yogyakarta: Pusat Studi Kependudukan dan Kebijakan UGM.
Ellwood, Sheila. 1993. Parish and Town Councils: Financial Accountability and Management. Local Government Studies. Vol. 19: 368-386. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003939308433687
Hardojo, P. A, dkk. 2008. Mendahulukan Miskin: Buku Sumber bagi Anggaran Pro Rakyat. (Waidl, A., Sudjito, A., dan Bahagijo, S. [Eds.]), Yogyakarta: LKS
Hatry, H. P.1999. Performance Measurement, Getting Result. Washington. D.C: The Urban Institute Press.
Indriyono Agus, Gitusudarmo dan Basri. 2002. Manajemen Keuangan. Yogyakarta. BPFE.
Irfan Fahmi. 2010. Manajemen Kinerja Teori dan Aplikasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Kumorotomo. Wahyudi. 2013. Akuntabilitas Birokrasi Publik:Sketsa pada masa transisi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Mardiasmo. 2004. Otonomi dan Manajemen Keuangan Daerah. Yogyakarta: Andi.
Miles, B. Mathew dan Michael Huberman. 1992. Analisis Data Kualitatif Buku Sumber Tentang Metode-Metode Baru. Jakarta: UIP.
Moleong, Lexy J. 2006. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nisjar Karhi S. 1997. Beberapa Catatan Tentang “Good Governance”, Jurnal Administrasi dan Pembangunan. Vol. 1, No.2. Jakarta. Himpunan Sarjana Administrasi Indonesia
Raba, Manggaukang. 2006. Akuntabilitas, Konsep dan Implementasi. Malang: Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang Press.
Robertson, J. P., & Tang, Shui-Yan. 1995. The Role Of Commitment In Collective Action: Comparing The Organizational Behavior And Rational Choice Perspectives. Public Administration Review, 55 (1), 67-80.
Sedarmayanti. 2003. Good Govenance (Kepemerintahan yang Baik). Dalam Rangka Otonomi Daerah. Bandung: Mandar Maju
Stevens, E. C., & Cooper, T. J. 2009. A Behavioral Theory Of Governments’ Ability To Make Credible Commitments To Firms: The Case Of The East Asian Paradox. Asia Pac J Manag, 27, 587–610.
Stivers, C. 1994. The Listening Bureaucrat: Responsiveness in Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 54 (4), 364-369.
Suartana, I Wayan. 2010. Akuntansi Keperilakuan Teori dan Implementasi. Yogyakarta: Andi.
TAF (The Asia Foundation) & ADB (Asian Development Bank). 2006. A Guidebook on Local Government Budget Analysis and Advocacy in Indonesia (Panduan Analisis dan Advokasi Anggaran Pemerintah Daerah di Indonesia). TAF dan ADB.
Wildavsky, A. 1961. Political Implications of Budgetary Reform. Public Administration Review, 21 (4), 183-190.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Yudithiane Magdalena Florence BEREK, Petrus KASE, Petrus D. E Rosari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.