Green Intellectual Capital and Carbon Performance: The Moderating Role of Audit Quality

Authors

  • Ulfa Rahmawati Madiun State Polytechnic
  • Lely Kumalawati Madiun State Polytechnic

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38142/jogta.v4i4.1970

Keywords:

Green Intellectual Capital, Carbon Performance, Audit Quality

Abstract

This study aims to examine the effect of Green Intellectual Capital (GIC) on carbon performance and to investigate the moderating role of audit quality in this relationship. The study employs panel data from firms from 2023 to 2024. The analysis is conducted using a panel data regression approach with a Random Effect Model (REM) and robust standard errors. The results indicate that Green Intellectual Capital does not have a significant effect on carbon performance. Furthermore, audit quality is not found to moderate the relationship between Green Intellectual Capital and carbon performance. These findings suggest that both internal capabilities and external monitoring mechanisms are insufficient to enhance a firm's carbon performance. The implications of this study highlight the need for more substantive environmental practices and stronger regulatory frameworks to improve carbon performance.

References

Adu, D. A., Flynn, A., & Grey, C. (2023). Carbon performance, financial performance and market value: The moderating effect of pay incentives. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(4), 2111–2135. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3239

Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108

Chen, Y.-S. (2007). The Positive Effect of Green Intellectual Capital on Competitive Advantages of Firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(3), 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9349-1

Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2011). Does it really pay to be green? Determinants and consequences of proactive environmental strategies. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30(2), 122–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2010.09.013

DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(81)90002-1

DeFond, M., & Zhang, J. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2–3), 275–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.09.002

Ferri, S., Gotti, G., & Morrone, C. (2025). Green intellectual capital disclosure, CEO gender and corporate performance: An analysis of Italian listed companies. Business Process Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-10-2024-0940

Francis, J., LaFond, R., Olsson, P. M., & Schipper, K. (2004). Costs of Equity and Earnings Attributes. The Accounting Review, 79(4), 967–1010. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2004.79.4.967

Huang, C., & Kung, F. (2011). Environmental consciousness and intellectual capital management: Evidence from Taiwan’s manufacturing industry. Management Decision, 49(9), 1405–1425. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741111173916

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2014). Does voluntary carbon disclosure reflect underlying carbon performance? Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 10(3), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2014.08.003

Matsumura, E. M., Prakash, R., & Vera-Muñoz, S. C. (2014). Firm-Value Effects of Carbon Emissions and Carbon Disclosures. The Accounting Review, 89(2), 695–724. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50629

Simnett, R., Vanstraelen, A., & Chua, W. F. (2009). Assurance on Sustainability Reports: An International Comparison. The Accounting Review, 84(3), 937–967. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2009.84.3.937

Yusoff, Y. M., Omar, M. K., Kamarul Zaman, M. D., & Samad, S. (2019). Do all elements of green intellectual capital contribute toward business sustainability? Evidence from the Malaysian context using the Partial Least Squares method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 234, 626–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.153

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30