The Influence of Accounting and Auditing Expertise in the Audit Committee on the Risk of Financial Statement Fraud: A Study on Mining and Energy Sector Companies Listed on the IDX in 2020-2024

Authors

  • Nucke Mariant Rachmawati State University of Surabaya
  • Ambar Kusumaningsih State University of Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38142/jogta.v4i3.1889

Keywords:

Accounting, Audit Expertise, Audit Committees, Financial Statement Fraud, Corporate Governance

Abstract

Finding out how energy and mining companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange fare in terms of audit committee accounting, auditing expertise, and financial statement fraud from 2020 to 2024 is the main goal of this study. You can tell whether an audit committee is competent if its members are certified professionals or if they have extensive knowledge of financial issues. When evaluating a company's financial statements for indicators of fraud, the Beneish M-Score is a useful tool. This research makes use of quantitative methods and secondary data collected from the company's books and yearly reports. To carry out the sampling procedure, the purposive sample strategy was utilized, using preset criteria. With the help of IBM SPSS software version 29, the data analysis method made use of multiple linear regression. According to the study's findings, having competent auditors and accountants on the audit committee greatly reduces the possibility of financial reporting fraud. In addition, debt and business size have a favorable effect on M-Score, whereas profitability has a considerably negative effect. All of the model's variables were considerably impacted simultaneously, as shown by a determination coefficient value (R²) of 0.918. Findings indicate that energy and mining companies may reduce their risk of financial reporting fraud by establishing an audit committee with sufficient accounting and auditing expertise.

References

ACFE~. (2022). Occu~pational Frau~d 2022: A Re~port To The~ Nations. Association of Ce~rtifie~d Frau~d E~xamine~rs, 1–96.

ACFE~ Re~port to the~ Nations. (2022). Occu~pational Frau~d 2022: A Re~port to the~ nations. Association of Ce~rtifie~d Frau~d E~xamine~rs, 1–96.

AICPA. (2020). State~me~nt on Au~diting Standards (SAS) No. 99: Conside~ration of Frau~d in a Financial State~me~nt Au~dit.

Andani, M., Sapu~tra, I., & Nasyir, A. (2024). Financial State~me~nt Frau~d: Profitability, Company Size~, Opportu~nity in Prope~rty and Re~al E~state~ Su~b-Se~ctor Companie~s. 1.

Astu~ti, W. S. (2024). The~ Influ~e~nce~ of Financial Stability, Le~ve~rage~ and Characte~ristics of the~ Au~dit Committe~e~ on Frau~du~le~nt Financial Re~porting. 2(7), 452–469.

Au~dit, P. K. (2025). The~ Influ~e~nce~ of the~ Au~dit Committe~e~, Company Size~ and Le~ve~rage~ on Frau~d in Financial State~me~nts. 7(4), 1398–1413.

Bare~zki, M. B., Fu~adah, L. L., & Yu~lianita, A. (2023). The~ Re~le~vance~ of Frau~d He~xagon The~ory to Financial State~me~nt Frau~d in the~ Banking Se~ctor in Indone~sia in 2017-2021. Jou~rnal of Bu~sine~ss E~conomics Informatics, 5, 927–931. https://doi.org/10.37034/infe~b.v5i3.650

Baron, R. M., & Ke~nny, D. A. (1986). The~ Mode~rator-Me~diator Variable~ Distinction in Social Psychological Re~se~arch. Conce~ptu~al, Strate~gic, and Statistical Conside~rations. Jou~rnal of Pe~rsonality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173

Che~u~ng, K. Y., & Chu~ng, C. V. (2022). The~ impacts of au~dit committe~e~ e~xpe~rtise~ on re~al e~arnings manage~me~nt : E~vide~nce~ from Hong Kong The~ impacts of au~dit committe~e~ e~xpe~rtise~ on re~al e~arnings manage~me~nt : E~vide~nce~ from Hong Kong. Coge~nt Bu~sine~ss & Manage~me~nt, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2126124

Dwianto, A., Pu~spitasari, D., & Se~tiawati, E~. (2024). Au~dit Committe~e~ Mode~ration as a Re~du~ce~r of Financial Re~porting Frau~d. Owne~r, 8(1), 839–860. https://doi.org/10.33395/owne~r.v8i1.1899

E~xchange~, S. (2025). De~te~cting Financial Re~porting Frau~d of Mining Companie~s on the~ Indone~sia Stock E~xchange~ on. 7(1), 104–112. https://doi.org/10.55732/u~nu~.gnk.2025.07.1.10

Fitriana, N., & Widarjo, W. (2020). Financial Stability, E~xte~rnal Pre~ssu~re~, and Au~dit Committe~e~ Compe~te~nce~ on Frau~du~le~nt Financial Re~porting.

Gu~ardian staff and age~ncy. (2023). E~ve~rgrande~: Chine~se~ firm and fou~nde~r fine~d ove~r $78bn frau~d claims.

Hae~kal, I., Taqi, M., & Su~santo, D. (2024). The~ E~ffe~ct of Au~dit Committe~e~ Characte~ristics, Au~dit Opinion, and Company Size~ on Financial Re~porting Frau~d. Finance~ and Su~stainability, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.58968/fs.v2i1.526

Hajiha, Z. (2019). Au~dit Committe~e~ Characte~ristics and Financial State~me~nt Comparability with the~ Mode~rating Role~ of Au~dit Firm Size~ and Corporate~ Gove~rnance~

I. Ayu~ Novitasari1*, I. B. U~. (2024). Vie~w of ANALYSIS OF FRAU~DU~LE~NT FINANCIAL RE~PORTING ON MINING COMPANIE~S LISTE~D ON THE~ IDX IN THE~ PE~RSPE~CTIVE~ OF FRAU~D HE~XAGON.pdf.

Imam Ghozali. (2021). Application of Mu~ltivariate~ Analysis with SPSS Program 26. In the~ Pu~blishing Body of Dipone~goro U~nive~rsity.

Indone~sia, S. E~., Achmad, T., Ghozali, I., & Pamu~ngkas, I. D. (2022). He~xagon Frau~d : De~te~ction of Frau~du~le~nt Financial Re~porting in. 1–16.

Ispriyahadi, H., & Abdu~lah, B. (2021). Analysis of The~ E~ffe~ct of Profitability , Le~ve~rage~ and Firm Size~ on Firm Valu~e~. 3(2).

Je~nse~n, M. C., & ∗ W. H. M. (1976). The~ory of the~ firm: Manage~rial be~havior, age~ncy costs and owne~rship stru~ctu~re~.

Ku~su~mawardani, M., Soe~diro, A., & Adhitama, F. (2024). The~ Role~ of the~ Au~dit Committe~e~ in Frau~du~le~nt Financial Re~porting. Indone~sian Accou~nting and Bu~sine~ss Re~vie~w, 8(2), 156–170. https://doi.org/10.18196/rabin.v8i2.20367

Ku~su~mosari, L., & Nu~r Rahardjo, S. (2023). Au~dit Committe~e~ E~ffe~ctive~ne~ss As Frau~d Pre~ve~ntion Me~chanisms. Airlangga Jou~rnal of Accou~nting and Bu~sine~ss Re~se~arch, 8(2), 1602–1623. https://doi.org/10.20473/jraba.v8i2.51157

Michae~l C. Je~nse~n. (1998). The~ory of the~ Firm: Manage~rial Be~havior, Age~ncy Costs and Owne~rship Stru~ctu~re~.

Miftahu~l Jannah, V., Andre~as, A., & Rasu~li, M. (2021). Vou~sinas Frau~d He~xagon Mode~l Approach in De~te~cting Financial Re~porting Frau~d. Indone~sian Accou~nting and Finance~ Stu~die~s, 4(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.21632/saki.4.1.1-16

Mu~hajirin, Risnita, & Asru~lla. (2024). Qu~antitative~ Re~se~arch Approach at Re~se~arch Stage~s. Jou~rnal Ge~nta Mu~lia, 15(1), 82–92.

Wow. (2019). Classical Assu~mption Te~st Analysis. https://bbs.binu~s.ac.id/manage~me~nt/2019/12/analisis-u~ji-asu~msi-klasik

Nu~groho, D., & Diyanty, V. (2022). He~xagon Frau~d in Frau~du~le~nt Financial State~me~nts: the~ Mode~rating Role~ of Au~dit Committe~e~. Indone~sian Jou~rnal of Accou~nting and Finance~, 19(1), 46–67. https://doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2022.03

Pu~rwiyanti, D., & He~rry Laksito. (2022). The~ E~ffe~ct of Au~dit Committe~e~ E~ffe~ctive~ne~ss and Pote~ntial Frau~du~le~nt Financial State~me~nts. AKSI Jou~rnal (Accou~nting and Information Syste~ms), 7(1), 86–97. https://doi.org/10.32486/aksi.v7i1.273

Rasid, S. Al. (2024). Financial Re~ports ( E~mpirical Stu~dy on Mining Companie~s in the~. 7(3), 8347–8366.

Razali, W. A. A. W. M., & Arshad, R. (2014). Disclosu~re~ of Corporate~ Gove~rnance~ Stru~ctu~re~ and the~ Like~lihood of Frau~du~le~nt Financial Re~porting. Social and Be~havioral Scie~nce~s, 145, 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.06.032

Re~zae~e~, Z. (2020). Bu~sine~ss Su~stainability, Corporate~ Gove~rnance~, and Organizational Inte~grity: The~ Inte~rnal Au~ditors' Pe~rspe~ctive~.

Ru~chiatna, A., Hidayat, W., & Pamu~ngkas, I. D. (2020). The~ E~ffe~ct of Au~dit Committe~e~ and Au~ditor Re~pu~tation on Frau~du~le~nt Financial Re~porting.

Ru~chiatna, G., Midiastu~ty, P. P., & Su~ranta, E~. (2020). The~ e~ffe~ct of au~dit committe~e~ characte~ristics on frau~du~le~nt financial re~porting. Jou~rnal of Accou~nting, Finance~, and Manage~me~nt, 1(4), 255–264.

Sari, M. P., Mahardika, E~., Su~ryandari, D., & Raharja, S. (2022). The~ au~dit committe~e~ as mode~rating the~ e~ffe~ct of he~xagon's frau~d on frau~du~le~nt financial state~me~nts in mining companie~s liste~d on the~ Indone~sia stock e~xchange~. Coge~nt Bu~sine~ss and Manage~me~nt, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2150118

Shanikat, M., & Aldabbas, M. M. (2025). Pe~rce~ption of Corporate~ Gove~rnance~ Factors in Mitigating Financial State~me~nt Frau~d in E~me~rging Marke~ts: Jordan E~xpe~rie~nce~. Jou~rnal of Risk and Financial Manage~me~nt, 18(8), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18080430

Siantu~ri, D. J. A. (2024). Flu~ctu~ating Commodity Price~s' E~ffe~ct on Indone~sian Coal and Palm Oil. E~QU~ITY (Jou~rnal of E~conomics and Finance~), 8(1), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2024.v8.i1.5916

Siboro, R., Nu~rae~ni, N. R., & Mu~slim, A. I. (2025). THE~ E~FFE~CT OF PROFITABILITY AND AU~DIT QU~ALITY ON FINANCIAL STATE~ME~NT FRAU~D. 6(1), 35–43.

Su~giyono. (2020). Qu~antitative~, Qu~alitative~ and R&D Re~se~arch Me~thodologie~s.

Su~rve~y, H., Iia, N., Indone~sia, A., & Tahu~n, C. (2022). FRAU~D RISK.

Su~ryani, A. W., Se~tiaji, Y. T., Re~tnaningsih, P., & Alfianto, I. (2025). Re~se~arch and Financial Accou~ntability. Accou~nting, Finance~, and Manage~me~nt Stu~die~s, 5(1), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.35912/sakman.v5i1.3698

The~ Gre~e~n Hye~na. (2023). 2023's Bigge~st Financial Scandals: The~ Cru~mbling Hou~se~s of Cards.

Wahyu~di, I., Boe~di, S., Kadir, A., Tinggi, S., E~konomi, I., & Banjarmasin, I. (2022). FRAU~DU~LE~NT FINANCIAL STATE~ME~NTS ( FRAU~DU~LE~NT ) SE~CTOR. 13(2.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-12